Over 59603

Science Politics

Junk Scientists Claim Hurricane Drought Is Just “Dumb Luck” -

global warming policies -

TAGS: politicization of science global warming policy fail watermelon red on the inside
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by calron

calron - February 9, 2016, 2:29 am
Actually it is a satirical reference to being green on the outside and rd on the inside.
Greeny - February 8, 2016, 7:41 pm

because nothing can top a cool melon on a h** day

Snowmageddon 2016 -

TAGS: snowmageddon 2016 winter storm jonas new york city nyc snow climate change global warming tyrannosaurus rex science deniers skeptics blizzard
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - January 24, 2016, 2:07 pm
New York should have obviously passed a law outlawing snowzilla from entering the state. :D

The Gold Standard For Global Warming Failure -

Republiklans -

Paris climate accord -

EPA: Killing Manatees In The Name Of Global Warming -

Global Warming: The Religion of Stupid -

Global Warming Is A Hoax -

Global Warming Idiocy -

Bill Nye the Anti-Science Douche -

Global Warming Truth -

An Inconvenient Truth -

Methane Madness -

According to liberals -

TAGS: man made climate negates science in nature
Rating: 4.67/5

More politifakes by OTC

OTC - April 8, 2015, 12:46 pm
Haven't you been paying attention? I have brought up other scientific events that effect the climate and have been lambasted for doing so because it goes against the 97% consensus of CO2, but I suppose attacking character is a real discussion in your eye?
DebtToAmerica - April 8, 2015, 4:51 am
no, just according to you. or more specifically, the delicate strawman you've created so you can post deliberate misinformation to avoid having a real discussion.

Liberal Science Deniers -

Liberal Science Deniers -

TAGS: liberal science deniers warmists alarmists greenies hysterians green religion al gore ipcc green tyranny junk science
Rating: 4.64/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - June 22, 2015, 12:15 am
Also that 97% number come Cook's a***yzes of studies, rather than a poll of scientists. The actual polls like doran & zimmerman have it just below 90%. They also claim pointing this out is nitpucking, but if it is so inconsequential, then why use the 97?

Climate Change Is REAL -

Risible Climate Alarmism From the Cult Of Climatology -

Global Warming Is A SCAM -

NASA's Global Warming Idiocy -

Global Warming Idiots -

A frothy mix -

TAGS: santorum science needsl a towel
Rating: 4.58/5

More politifakes by Zeitguy

rebeccaolsen - June 12, 2015, 7:00 pm
5Ls =p

When Messaging Collides With Science -

Liberal Science Deniers -

Warmist Asininity -

Global Warming Is Junk Science -

Science Proves Global Warming Is A Myth -

When Will The Global Warming Cultists Admit They Were Wrong? -

Bill Nye The Science Hack & Political Flunky -

Science Expert Rep. Steve Israel Offers ‘Deniers’ Proof of Climate Change -

TAGS: steve israel climate change hoaxer global warming stooge junk science greenies warmists alarmists hysterians eco fascism al gore ipcc democrat liberal hypocrisy stupidity
Rating: 4.53/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

rebeccaolsen - June 7, 2015, 4:07 pm
guest818 - June 7, 2015, 4:06 pm
Live or die, Rebecca. Make your choice. ^_^
rebeccaolsen - June 7, 2015, 4:05 pm
What is this amazing technology that you are using that causes me to hear Tobin "Jigsaw" Bell's voice when you post a comment? :D
guest818 - June 7, 2015, 4:00 pm
My side is splitting, Conserva. Almost as funny as Barack's and Michelle's his-and-her jets to fundraisers. Wonder how much they cranked up global warming with that convenience? 5Led

Global Warming Atheist -

Global Warming Is A Scam -

Warmist 'Logic' -

Eco-Fascism -

Bill Nye the Junk Science Guy -

Global Warming Presstitute -

Apollo 7 Astronaut Speaks Out On Climate Alarmism -

Warmist Dumbassery -

Activist scientists tried to ban this pesticide by drawing a conclusion before doing the research -

Alert: Nations Now Capable Of Using Online Photo Meme Makers To Launch Missiles anywhere -

TAGS: batman robin o reilly science deniers
Rating: 4.48/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

rebeccaolsen - May 30, 2015, 2:49 pm
BUMP http://i.imgur.com/IIqQu.gif


TAGS: co2 truth carbon dioxide global warming climate change hoax junk science
Rating: 4.47/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - February 28, 2015, 10:11 pm
That "truth is called, ]Affirming a Disjunct.

Global Warming Hiatus -

The Complete Insanity of the Climate Change Debate -

Typical Warmist -

Comb -

TAGS: ancient aliens science denial climate
Rating: 4.39/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

guest818 - June 9, 2015, 1:24 pm
You accuse the scientific community of perpetrating a hoax over AGW.#77008 There is your conspiracy theory.You also accuse members here of "pushing" AGW. There is your other conspiracy theory. Maybe they simply accept it. After all, it is accepted science
guest818 - June 9, 2015, 1:14 pm
the only conspiracy theory you see? you said [#76973]"Conspiracy theories?when have I pushed a conspiracy theory?" I see 2 in ONE post alone.#77006,(1)"The only conspiracy theory I see here is man-made global warming." (2)"And you clowns push it hard"
guest818 - June 9, 2015, 1:10 pm
accepted science is not a conspiracy theory. that is why it is accepted.
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 9, 2015, 11:52 am
The only conspiracy theory I see here is man-made global warming. And you, like the other global warming clowns here, push it hard.
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 9, 2015, 11:51 am
narcissistically-formulated politicized thinking?!? Did you learn some new words and forget to look up the definitions?
guest818 - June 9, 2015, 2:16 am
but rather than accept those facts, you deny in favor of a conspiracy theory that you should at least be equally skeptical about if skepticism was truly your agenda. you are not, because trolling is your agenda.
guest818 - June 9, 2015, 2:15 am
you acknowledge that reputable researchers received govt grants, clearly that is public knowledge, as is their funding, which is disclosed. The denier scientist you are referring to was caught deliberately not disclosing his private corporate funding
guest818 - June 9, 2015, 2:12 am
#76995 responded to your narcissistically-formulated politicized thinking in #76992
guest818 - June 9, 2015, 2:10 am
another one of your conspiracy theories.
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 9, 2015, 2:09 am
If source of funding is not important, then explain this crap: http://www.politifake.org/fairy-tales-wei-hock-soon-science-deniers-funding-politics-62846.html
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 9, 2015, 2:06 am
and where does their money come from? Ever see a government contract? It's written something like "Produce proof that anthropogenic global warming exists." Hardworking? More like political leeches.
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 9, 2015, 2:01 am
awww, did your but.tons get smashed again? try putting some of your forehead grease on it and it might loosen up and reset.
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 9, 2015, 2:00 am
here's what your comments amount to: caw...skip...caw...skip...caw..skip... ad nauseum. You most definitely are a one trick pony.
guest818 - June 9, 2015, 1:59 am
you dont give those hardworking folks the benefit of the doubt.You flippantly dismiss their data while narcissistically favoring politicized talking points,which you should be (at least)equally skeptical about.Points to paranoid conspiracy minded thinking
guest818 - June 9, 2015, 1:49 am
researchers weren't from some sort of "Institute to find AGW." They're from depts focused on polar research and Earth sciences. whatever the data tells them is what eventually forms a consensus one way or another and reality just happens to have a bias.
guest818 - June 9, 2015, 1:32 am
who are actually generating the results that point to anthropogenic warming, so it can't possibly provide an incentive to them.what money is left, little of it actually go to scientists.
guest818 - June 9, 2015, 1:30 am
your argument displays a profound ignorance of how science and science funding work. the vast majority of that govt money is in the form of "Climate Technology," None of that money goes to the researchers
guest818 - June 9, 2015, 1:28 am
looks like your bu.tton was pushed again. you can tell when you drop another one of your "conspiracy theories", to answer you from earlier [#76973].Reputable AGW climate scientists are not engaging in shady practices involving govt funding,your contention
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 9, 2015, 12:07 am
hypocrite much?
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 9, 2015, 12:07 am
faux, faux, faux! You argued that the "denier" didn't reveal his funding and it was a big deal to you. None of the science alarmists are revealing their funding, but it doesn't phase you because they duped you into thinking like them (or not thinking).
rebeccaolsen - May 30, 2015, 2:50 pm
BUMP http://i.imgur.com/IIqQu.gif


Bill nye -

Bill Nye The Science Flunky -

when they argue against the consensus -

Shameful Climate Witch Hunt -

TAGS: global warming climate change alarmists junk science al gore ipcc
Rating: 4.33/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

fauxnews - March 4, 2015, 9:26 pm
Sad but true.
DebtToAmerica - March 4, 2015, 8:59 pm
science shouldn't need political enforcers, but when its under constant attack from corporate lobbyists paid by the fossil fuel industry things tend to get political.

Global Warming -

TAGS: global warming climate change hoax junk science
Rating: 4.33/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Zeitguy - February 26, 2015, 12:02 am
You know when any response to a completely moronic poster will validate their idiotic, baseless, rhetoric and only dissolve into an unintellecual diatribe? Well, I'm not falling for that.

Global Warming is a Farce -

TAGS: global warming farce junk science climate change hoax ipcc al gore
Rating: 4.27/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - March 14, 2015, 7:33 pm
That could explain the global warming pause and be used to show yet another reason that the pause doesn't disprove MMGW.



TAGS: co2 truth global warming hoax climate change con al gore junk science tree huggers hippies liberals democrats progressives statism socialism carbon credits
Rating: 4.27/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Cyberhagen - March 7, 2015, 12:53 pm
faux, I think there are fewer young earth creationists than you think. Or at least I would hope so.
OTC - March 7, 2015, 12:41 am
beginning of the industrial revolution
OTC - March 7, 2015, 12:39 am
Prior to the little ice age temperatures were higher than they are now. in the 13th century volcanoes became active then the sun entered the maunder minimum. with less volcanism and more solar activity, the little ice age ended which coincided with the b
OTC - March 6, 2015, 6:26 pm
Around 1940 there was a cooling period and scientists warned of a coming ice age, so how can there be cooling in the middle of the industrial revolution, especially when factories were in full force during the wars?
OTC - March 6, 2015, 4:42 pm
GW is real as is CC, science and history proves that. The debate is whether man is causing or contributing to it
OTC - March 6, 2015, 4:22 pm
The industrial revolution began around 1750, which is also about the same time the "mini ice age" ended. You can't possibly think that man-made CO2 had that quick of an effect on warming?
OTC - March 6, 2015, 4:11 pm
I think there is a lot of confusion between MMGW/MMCC & GW/CC
fauxnews - March 6, 2015, 3:59 pm
:-) And sorry for the stupid question. But there is a denier camp out there - the Inhofe camp - that basically says, "Global Warming isn't real cuz Gawd says so." At that point, what's the point? Cheers =)
OTC - March 6, 2015, 3:42 pm
Of course the earth is older than 6000 yrs
fauxnews - March 6, 2015, 3:23 pm
Because that 800 year lag means nothing if, like some deniers, you fall into the creationism camp. So, OTC, out of pure curiosity, do you agree with 99.9% of scientists out there that the world is much older than 6000 years old? just curious
fauxnews - March 6, 2015, 3:22 pm
DebttoAmerica brings up a good point. Here's an interesting question for you, in order to gauge your scientific objectivity. It's an easy question any rational person should be willing to answer: do you believe the world is 6000 years old?
DebtToAmerica - March 6, 2015, 3:16 pm
if there was an 800 year lag at the end of the last ice age, why isnt there a lag today? CO2 levels started rising dramatically a few decades after the start of the industrial revolution, and the global average temperatures started rising soon after.
fauxnews - March 6, 2015, 9:39 am
Save you the trouble. See poster #61904 for why you are wrong. ;-) Another half-truth, trick deniers are trying to pass off as a credible argument - a myth debunked LONG ago. You're welcome =)
OTC - March 6, 2015, 7:49 am
You can start by researching 800 year lag CO2
DebtToAmerica - March 6, 2015, 1:31 am
would you like to present the evidence you're referring to?

Global Warming Alarmists Ignore Latest SCIENCE -

Global Warming Hysterians: Not So Good At Math -

TAGS: global warming hysterians climate change junk science global warming hoax warmists green religion greenies alarmists al gore ipcc radical environmentalism eco fascism epa thugs the sky is falling greenpeace stupidity algore manbearpig
Rating: 4.27/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

fauxnews - May 1, 2015, 11:26 pm
You are correct: It has been "a long time" since you had a "math class." Also, if you had a science class, I shutter at the grade you got. Then there is the reading & writing class, ie. did you actually "read" this study? 1L for sheer ignorance

Want to know how I got these scars? -

The Green TRUTH -

Bill Nye the Liberal Establishment’s Cartoonish Pseudoscience Guy -

TAGS: bill nye pseudoscience guy science hack junk scientist alarmist warmist greenie al gore hysterian global warming hoax climate change scam ipcc eco fascism
Rating: 4.18/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Zeitguy - June 30, 2015, 6:41 pm
I'm guessing in your world the "science guy" label marks him as a political target. BTW I hate having to comment on your obviously regurgitated posters.

Republican Science Deniers -

TAGS: joker republican science deniers wei hock soon
Rating: 4.11/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - June 7, 2015, 3:34 pm
Looks like I pushed your b***ons very well. ;)
fauxnews - May 26, 2015, 3:10 pm
lol..Exactly. ;-) 5L your comment if I could. Cheers
Bandit5906 - May 26, 2015, 3:04 pm
Spell check?

You can ignore the man behind the curtain -

TAGS: science deniers christians climate change
Rating: 4.1/5

More politifakes by rebeccaolsen

rebeccaolsen - June 15, 2015, 9:47 pm
Zeitguy - June 15, 2015, 8:31 pm
Those noses will live in my nightmares tonight:)

Republican Science Deniers -

TAGS: science denial republicans inhofe climate change
Rating: 4.1/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - June 7, 2015, 3:33 pm
Well thanks for taking the time to try to demonstate [sic] my point. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inductive_reasoning

Remember how we all scoffed -

TAGS: science over politics
Rating: 4.05/5

More politifakes by Zeitguy

guest818 - June 3, 2015, 5:23 am
still? was it ever in doubt?

Fairy tales -

TAGS: wei hock soon science deniers funding
Rating: 4.03/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - May 25, 2015, 10:11 pm
Except I didn't defend Soon, I pointed out how someone got what he said wrong. Soon believe that variation in that cycle cause warming, but that is not what he was attacked for.
fauxnews - May 25, 2015, 9:41 pm
And Wei Hack Soon was using 'that' to (falsely) indict the MMCC consensus in the most ignorant of manners. Not that it matters, mate. Following the exposure of his corruption, only a pure ignoramus would defend Wei Soon at this point. You were saying? :-)
calron - May 25, 2015, 9:20 pm
Yeh, you'd think you'd at least get his hypothesis right when you attack it. The output of the sun does change over time and that does affect the earth's climate on a 11 year cycle.
rebeccaolsen - May 17, 2015, 11:57 am
Pretty much,denier.Either,ignorantly or purposely ignoring the irony of his derp, he is basically saying that all that man-made climate change stuff is just the normal seasons "going through the motions" - kinda like the way you are doing right now hun :)
calron - May 16, 2015, 7:57 pm
So he believes in summer and winter?
rebeccaolsen - May 13, 2015, 2:44 am

Global Warming Is Junk Science -

TAGS: global warming climate change hoax junk science
Rating: 4/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - February 22, 2015, 12:34 am
fauxnews - February 22, 2015, 12:27 am
How about a nice slice of key lime pie then?
calron - February 22, 2015, 12:27 am
So you're back to repeating a claim over and over like saying it enough times makes it right.
fauxnews - February 21, 2015, 11:28 pm
*yawn* When you actually present evidence, we'll talk. So far you've only managed to put up links that say the opposite of what you say it did. The rest of the conversation so far is just you trying to deflect the fact that you did that.
calron - February 21, 2015, 11:19 pm
So Ad Hominem attacks while ignoring the evidence presented.
fauxnews - February 16, 2015, 9:21 pm
Said.No.Real.Scientist.Ever. X-D
OTC - February 16, 2015, 9:11 pm
Someone who believes the "man-made" global warming hoax its no surprise they believe in the 97% consensus hoax too
fauxnews - February 16, 2015, 1:39 am
So is that No to the pie?
fauxnews - February 16, 2015, 1:38 am
P.P.S. The first word in that article you posted by "James Taylor" says "OPINION". How 'scientific' of you: An OP-ED.Oh the irony.Speaking of irony *ahem* Your slip is showing ;-) http://www.politifake.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=9728&start=90#p138733
fauxnews - February 16, 2015, 1:16 am
P.S. Again, please refer to posts #72898,#72899. You're welcome.
fauxnews - February 16, 2015, 1:08 am
I like apple pie the best, but I wouldn't say no to chocolate meringue.
calron - February 16, 2015, 1:05 am
Bad link, second try, http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/02/13/peer-reviewed-survey-finds-majority-of-scientists-skeptical-of-global-warming-crisis/
calron - February 16, 2015, 12:44 am
See http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/05/30/global-warming-alarmists-caught-doctoring-97-percent-consensus-claims/ and http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/02/13/peer-reviewed-survey-finds-majority-of-scientists-skeptical-of-global-warm
calron - February 16, 2015, 12:42 am
In addition the 97% number comes from, " 9798% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field surveyed here support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change" and other such things that do not pan out.
calron - February 16, 2015, 12:39 am
I was bring up your argument from ignorance response, as it is there is no way to actually test global warming theory, as it is the same reason for invalidity holds.
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 11:07 pm
*bar = *pay ... The only thing nuttier than the censor here is my device's idea of auto-correcting. :-/
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 11:05 pm
Alrighty then! *in my worst Jim Carrey voice* Got a long drive ahead of me to get to that lovely mountain town I call home. Thank's everyone for coming out and bar the bartender on your way out.Thaynk yuz.Thaynk yuz vury much *in my best Elvis voice*
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 11:04 pm
But, hey, to quote your idol Bill O'Reilly "you can have the last word." Fair enough?
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 10:55 pm
Please refer to posts #72898,#72899 for now on if you cant let this go.Same goes for your ”friends." You guys are like heads on a Tea Party hydra.And you and I BOTH KNOW what I mean by that,"Calron."(lol)Just look at the flowers Lizzie ;-p *chortle*Cheers
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 10:48 pm
*ahem* Russell's teapot is still referred to in discussions concerning the existence of God. You are bringing philosophy into an argument about science? lol..Science is about disproving theories, vetting data so that stands up to the scrutiny of science
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 10:44 pm
So (B) it is. Thank you for clearing that up. "Dumb stuff?" How 'scientific' of you. The data, and the 97% consensus that backs it, is anything but "dumb." But the way you are handling it certainly is. X-D
calron - February 15, 2015, 10:31 pm
"not been properly disproven" doesn't scientifically equate with right. That is what is called negative proof and look into Russell's teapot on why it is not valid.
calron - February 15, 2015, 10:28 pm
So basically you ignore part of what is said and focus on the dumb stuff and pretend that is best argument. That is one way to strawman.
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 10:23 pm
So, in other words: are you (a) scientific about this? and hence respect the authoritative conclusion that - at this moment in time - manmade climate change is a reality? or (b) you are just BSing me here? *Jeopardy music is up*
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 10:21 pm
...and after everything you said, (b) is essentially the same thing as BS in the world of science because it's not the opinions of scientists that we are speaking of..but their data which is reflected by that 97% consensus. The science speaks for itself
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 10:20 pm
In other words,the correct scientific answer would be (a) Yes, the data is compelling & i do not deny that the theories about man-made climate change have not been properly disproven,so they are authoritative until then or (b)i dont believe in the science
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 10:15 pm
*Jeopardy music almost up*
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 10:14 pm
But we all lean one way or another. And I agree,I cant be "for certain" that GW is man-made,but I heavily lean that way because the data is so compelling and authoritative. So, please,which way do you lean? Again(a)your stance is or (b)sit on that fence?
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 10:12 pm
Yet,the deniers offer data that is easily sh** down.So they argue that government conspiracy,liberal politics & elaborate hoaxes are to explain for why a consensus hasn’t changed.If u can’t see what’s wrong with that, don’t expect me to explain it to ya.
calron - February 15, 2015, 10:11 pm
I'm not actually certain that global warming is man made, and I actually do know what scientific consensus, but once again you use ridicule in the place of an actual argument like ridiculing people willing to say that they are not sure over taking a side.
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 10:10 pm
Sure, dissent is allowed (some people still believe in a flat Earth) but typically when a handful of scientists discover a groundbreaking game-changing truth about GW,then typically the methods will support that find and quickly change the consensus.
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 10:10 pm
For instance, consensus means that 97 times out of 100, that using the same methods you can't find data and conclusions to disprove man-made climate change. This has remained the case for many, many years. Hence why it is authoritative.
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 10:01 pm
P.S. Thank you, "Calron"(lol) for clearly admitting your utter failure to understand or comprehend what scientific consensus is and means. Popularity contest? bwahahahaha X-D
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 9:55 pm
So...(a) do you believe in man-made climate change? or (b) you are just B.S.ing... *cue Jeopardy music*
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 9:55 pm
By man? Let's end this debate right now. In addition you believe that the Earth was warmed...by man-made climate change? Just wondering if you are fence sitting or taking an actual stand.
calron - February 15, 2015, 9:28 pm
Your repeated appeals to popularity and use id ridicule do not make you right, and even with that you cannot evn show that they view is popular to start with. In addition I do believe the that earth has warmed.
OTC - February 15, 2015, 2:42 pm
There are plenty of climatologists that disagree with the scientists
OTC - February 15, 2015, 2:39 pm
I haven't changed my stand on "man-made" global warming, I still think it's a hoax. Climate change is real however, but liberals think because the name was changed that it still stands for man-made
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 2:36 pm
With all due respect,"Dudley(lol)", you send me threatening personal messages but expect me to take you seriously in what is meant to be a civil debate about science? Thanks, but I'll pass. "Go away kid, ya bother me." *in my best W.C.Fields voice* X-D
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 2:32 pm
The problem with your position, OTC, as always, is that virtually every scientist on the planet disagrees with you. But if siding with the handful of crackpots,many of whom also believe in creationism,Bigfoot,aliens and a flat earth, rocks your world.Cool
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 2:30 pm
Nah, they only changed the name OTC - unlike you, who keeps changing your position and contradicting yourself. The liberals still blame the mass quantities of CO2 in the atmosphere - which is anything BUT natural.
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 2:28 pm
OTC - February 15, 2015, 2:26 pm
Pesky liberals stand was "man-made" global warming and now stand by climate change, a natural cycle of the earth, for the cause of global warming. Liberals must have fallen off the fence and hit their heads
DudleyDoRight - February 15, 2015, 3:34 am
You are just moving the goal posts again. Instead of offering an actual source you are offering youtube links and more strawmen. There are many scientists who do not consider global warming to be "a fact" http://www.wsj.com/mythof97percentclimatechange
DudleyDoRight - February 15, 2015, 2:27 am
More Ad nauseam replies. Believing in global warming is not the same as worshipping it. :D Your personal attacks do nothing to prove you're right. Ridicule all you want. all the personal attacks in the world won't change that.
DudleyDoRight - February 15, 2015, 2:27 am
More Ad nauseam replies. Believing in global warming is not the same thing as worshipping it. :D Your personal attacks do nothing to prove you're right. Ridicule all you want. All the personal attacks in the world won't change that.
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 1:03 am
Okay, lucky you caught me in line at the supermarket. Got my smokes (bad Faux! bad Faux! *slap my own hand*) Okay, have a good night everyone! Signing off. Good luck and good night.
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 1:00 am
The consensus you so readily dismiss means something to the scientific community even if it means nothing to you. I get it,you have your own interpretation of science.Good for you.You just happen to be wrong;according to virually ever scientist worldwide
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 12:53 am
If you want to say global warming is a hoax, then jump off your fence and just say it. Like i really care. At least Al Gore and his pesky liberals can take a stand. Where do you stand?No one in the scientific community would buy into your views on science
calron - February 15, 2015, 12:37 am
Science is based off of evidence, testing, and reason. It is the validity of both that gives it the authority, otherwise you get stuff like the sun revolves around the earth because the experts said so in contradiction to the facts and reason.
calron - February 15, 2015, 12:33 am
Consensus IS based on popular vote by definition. Additionally theories are not valid until proved wrong, rather validity comes from repeatedly testing a hypothesis and being unable to prove it wrong. What you're giving me is negative proof.
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 12:26 am
Okay, forgot my passport. Found it! Gotta go. A cold microbrew awaits this weary traveler. Nice chatting with you,"Calron"(lol). P.S. You forgot to call me "skippy." ;-) Cheers! =)
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 12:25 am
That's why it is called a "consensus." Again, science wield authority by consensus otherwise it wields no authority at all. Any basic 101 science level class will teach you that. Go on a proper science forum and see how far you will get with this argument
fauxnews - February 15, 2015, 12:23 am
Said.No.Scientist.Ever. X-D I never said anything about "voting." Science is based upon theory and the scientific method.Duh.Until a theory has been properly disproven using the scientific method,it stands.The 97%consensus has very little to do w/voting
calron - February 15, 2015, 12:00 am
No, the authority of science is based on proof and reason, not popularity. Therefor the probability of truth is not based voting. And if their is such a chance it is wrong (votes are not evidence), it would not be right to call it a fact.
fauxnews - February 14, 2015, 10:28 pm
It is done by consensus otherwise it has no authority at all. And it is scientific fact the world is warming due to manmade CO2. There is a 3% probability the evidence is wrong. Probability is not popularity. Learn the difference
calron - February 14, 2015, 10:25 pm
On of the problem is that the ocean absorbs some of the excessive CO2 and thus changes the chemistry and harms fish. Thus of course is a separate issue from whether the Earth is warming or not. And science is not done by popular poll.
fauxnews - February 14, 2015, 10:04 pm
Good point! :-)The denialists cant suggest nature can handle,to quote you,this "fatal" excessive "quantity" of manmade CO2 polluting our atmosphere.Now lets get the other 3% of the world's thinkers to sign on to this.They're holding up the 97% of us.Bravo
fauxnews - February 14, 2015, 9:57 pm
And with the large quantities of CO2 we put into the air, it would follow... ;-)
calron - February 14, 2015, 9:53 pm
Even basic thinks that you need top live like oxygen and water are harmful, and even fatal in large enough quantities.
fauxnews - February 9, 2015, 9:54 pm
Get rid of the words in the title "Global Warming is", leave the rest, and you have a great poster here X-D
Zeitguy - February 9, 2015, 8:21 pm
Feces is also plant food but excessive quantities can be quite harmful.


Michael Crichton, scientist -

Don't Drink The Fool-Aid -

TAGS: global warming climate change hoax al gore junk science
Rating: 3.95/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

DebtToAmerica - February 9, 2015, 11:51 pm
fauxnews - February 9, 2015, 10:59 pm
Zeitguy - February 9, 2015, 9:39 pm
I know, 97% of the scientific community is on the take from liberal left. Enjoy the Kool-aid.

Global Warming Is A Hoax -

Global Warming Is Man-Made Up -

Climate Change Denier Logic -

Climatard -

Myth Of Arctic Meltdown -

Why does Intellectual atheism and faith driven creationism -


Al Gore -

Climate Denier Logic -

Bachmann -

TAGS: bachmann vaccines healthcare nuts science
Rating: 3.08/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

DebtToAmerica - February 8, 2015, 6:39 pm
"vaccines cause autism and mental retardation! i know because i had vaccines as a child and now i'm an anti-vaccination campaigner!"


Republican Science Deniers -

Money for "Scientific" Results -

TAGS: wei hock soon junk science
Rating: 2.71/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

MMessEnnBeeCee - May 28, 2015, 8:11 pm
and that includes government money! Thanks for finally admitting that.

Clark? Clark! -

TAGS: vacation national lampoon science denial
Rating: 2.67/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - May 10, 2015, 1:02 am
STOP READING MY MIND OX= *Puts on tin foil hat.*
Oldsod - May 4, 2015, 3:15 pm
One thing we can agree on, faux...poverty sucks. I saw a pontoon boat the other day...just two pontoons, a deck, an engine, and a small "gazebo," that was worth more than my house. Heck, I'd be happy with a canoe...
fauxnews - May 3, 2015, 10:28 pm
Already did.Yeah,my bike's that old :-/ Im cheap, so cheap I'd separate my 2 ply toilet paper to make 2 rolls if my family wouldnt kill me over it X-D They're already pi.ssed at me for trying to make whole milk into 2% by adding water so it'll last longer
OTC - May 3, 2015, 8:54 pm
Shoulda got the extended bike warranty
fauxnews - May 3, 2015, 2:52 pm
Keep it. :-) Have a good one, mate. P.S. Speaking of tinfoil, I'm starting to think my bike is made of the stuff. Second time this month I have to take it into repairs :-/ Another lost weekend *sigh* Catch ya on the flipside bloke
fauxnews - May 3, 2015, 2:50 pm
Nah,mate.That's your bag,remember? ;-) You're the expert.Im just a meat and potatoes science and reason man.I dont believe in conspiracy theories.I accept the science when it tells me something's unequivocal X-D You can be the junk science guy around here
calron - May 3, 2015, 2:25 pm
You wear a tin foil hat to prevent mind reading, you really need to brush up on your conspiracy theories.
rebeccaolsen - May 3, 2015, 2:14 pm
fauxnews - May 3, 2015, 2:03 pm
I'll accept your compliment,backhand and all ;-) haha Thank you, Beck.Been wanting to do one of these for a while.My little Harold Ramis tribute(a dearly departed filmmaker who directed Vacation,also a famous satirist).Have a good morning,mates.Cheers :-)
rebeccaolsen - May 3, 2015, 1:49 pm
Normally, I find your humor to be pretty dumb hun. But this time you nailed it :) Also, I'm probably the last living Chevy Chase fan,as you already know.Despite that - Objectively, can still give this: 5Lions Thank you for the Sunday morning laugh,sweetie
fauxnews - May 3, 2015, 1:41 pm
fauxnews - May 3, 2015, 1:41 pm
calron - May 3, 2015, 1:36 pm
What, no mention of mind probes?
rebeccaolsen - May 3, 2015, 1:15 pm

A Republican't pretend Science is what they want it to be -

Politifake School of Journalism and Politics -


G l o b a l W a r m i n g I d i o t s -

When a Republican science denier starts making excuses -

TAGS: ancient aliens science deniers excuses
Rating: 2.56/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - May 25, 2015, 10:18 pm
Translation (Calvon): Try to use more fancy words to cover my a$s.
calron - May 25, 2015, 10:15 pm
So did you not get the joke and cry or get it and cry as a "parody"?
fauxnews - May 25, 2015, 9:32 pm
Translation (Calvon): Waaah.
calron - May 25, 2015, 8:40 pm
Yep, you don;t the truth, you can't Handel the truth. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fa/George_Frideric_Handel_by_Balthasar_Denner.jpg :P


When a Republican science denier starts making excuses -

TAGS: ancient aliens science deniers excuses
Rating: 2.41/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - May 25, 2015, 10:33 pm
Okay, tell yourself that if it makes you feel better, mate. :-) *eating popcorn, enjoying the show*
calron - May 25, 2015, 10:28 pm
I don't know why you'r b***on are pushed, I just know you take the time to pretend to know what I think and get it wrong. Maybe I could go point out some of my spelling errors that no one mentioned, cause I've made many.
fauxnews - May 25, 2015, 10:23 pm
Mate...why would your bad spelling and your insecurity over it (with your pathological excuses) push MY b'uttons? ;-) haha You hand yourself over to us on a silver platter; ie.you are the gift that keeps on giving. But. please, continue with your show.
calron - May 25, 2015, 10:18 pm
Wow, didn't you just tantrum over a response of mine like this and call it lame? Looks like that Tomato In The Mirror is your fiercest opponent. :)
fauxnews - May 25, 2015, 9:27 pm
Glad to see you admit it. The first step is always the hardest X-D
calron - May 25, 2015, 8:38 pm
Looks like a b***on has been pushed. :P

o v e r g r o w n c h I l d r e n -

Global Warming Hysteria -

TAGS: joker climate change denial science
Rating: 2.33/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - May 16, 2015, 8:31 pm
Well you mention AGW and murders and I think of a nut that linked them. :P
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 2:41 pm
An MSNBC(lol) link to a former Playboy CEO's view on CC? BTW the scientists aren't linking CC to ice-cream murders or other such derpery, mate. They don't need to - the nut jobs have a monopoly on that. The OTHER link was a little funny though, denier ;-)
calron - May 10, 2015, 12:36 am
This reminds me of two things, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fk9hKZsSJ6o and http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_kyPhEiYq2tM/RmBJ2k1jbqI/AAAAAAAAAF8/-BA4cS6rnNw/s320/batmanhatesicecream.jpg ;)
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 8, 2015, 9:29 am
RE: 76003 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=14&v=EeCdWZUBneM
fauxnews - May 7, 2015, 6:57 pm
lol i wish i could 5L your comment. ;-)
rebeccaolsen - May 7, 2015, 6:51 pm
Facts are funny that way, denier. No matter how much you whine about them, the "record" on climate research will never change. FYI you might want to pick better puns and jokes, hun. So far, your track "record" is - you're the gift that keeps on giving :)
fauxnews - May 7, 2015, 6:36 pm
No, it's just your record is broken again.
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 7, 2015, 6:23 pm
FauxNews, I think that record is skipping
fauxnews - May 7, 2015, 5:16 pm
Who illegally uses drugs and then tries to get away it? Yeah, Republicans. X-D www.cbsnews.com/news/rush-limbaugh-arrested-on-drug-charges/
fauxnews - May 7, 2015, 5:11 pm
On Earth, we call that "proof." What do they call it where YOU are from? ;-p
fauxnews - May 7, 2015, 5:10 pm
E.G. The highly respected journal, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, a***yzed climate change science, and determined that 97-98% of researchers in climate science supported the tenets of human influenced climate change.
fauxnews - May 7, 2015, 5:09 pm
lol.."Without proof?" Tens of thousands of peer-reviewed papers on MMCC and the 97-98% consensus on it.
OTC - May 7, 2015, 5:01 pm
Who pushes for legalization of drugs? Yeah, liberals
OTC - May 7, 2015, 4:57 pm
The implication isn't that Reid had anything to do with the science of MMCC, but that liberals can say anything without proof of being right (using Reid as a perfect example)
rebeccaolsen - May 7, 2015, 4:52 pm
fauxnews - May 7, 2015, 4:43 pm
lol. What 'she' said. ;-) #REBECCA FTW
rebeccaolsen - May 7, 2015, 3:35 pm
My step-dad is Canadian.Best decision my mother ever made.Of course Canada rocks,denier.What's there not to like? That's a good boy(#75991)Now we just need to get you to change your ignorant views on global warming,and we'll throw you another bone,fido :)
rebeccaolsen - May 7, 2015, 3:13 pm
Yup, called it :) #75987+#75988=#75956 Hun,if you wanna EFFECTIVELY attack us "liberals" then u might wanna be smart enough to NOT leave behind your irritating calling card by using the words "hallucinations" and "drug-induced coma." Your-Calling-Card FTL
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 7, 2015, 3:08 pm
Plus, how was I to know that you are canadian?
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 7, 2015, 3:08 pm
I've never attacked canada. I think canada is a cool country.
fauxnews - May 7, 2015, 2:18 pm
#75985-->#75988 http://cdn.meme.am/instances/45470299.jpg
fauxnews - May 7, 2015, 2:15 pm
Ah, now comes out the "drug-induced" tics and the other one-trick ponies. You forgot to call us skippy and attack Canada. X-D
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 7, 2015, 1:52 pm
fauxnews, please allow me to correct your rant. "If you can see the ignorance in my statement, you are already ahead of the game" - you are welcome
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 7, 2015, 1:51 pm
I believe that you have summed them up pretty accurately OTC. Probably from that drug induced semi-coma that most liberals appear to suffer from. Hallucinations seem to contribute greatly to their lack of understanding of simple phrases and concepts.
fauxnews - May 7, 2015, 1:03 pm
Keep in mind EM,Im in no way responsible for whatever meaning you happen to a**ign to my words.If you're choosing to see an undercurrent of ignorance in the words I type,that really only reflects your own mindset,not mine.It was 'your' point,remember? ;-)
fauxnews - May 7, 2015, 12:49 pm
lol. When did Reid ever have anything to do with science being right or wrong about MMCC? - quid pro quo. You can bring up Reid's name in sarcasm but I can't respond with sarcasm of my own, mate? There's a word for that y'know. Rhymes with Shipocrite. X-D
rebeccaolsen - May 7, 2015, 11:13 am
Deniers are sooooo adorable when they pretend to be witty and know stuff. :) 'STILL-DOESNT-KNOW-SARCASM-WHEN-HE-SEES-IT' FTL
rebeccaolsen - May 7, 2015, 11:10 am
OTC, that was eloquently said for a guy who a**erts phony baloney all the time and then when called out on it spends weeks pretending he didn't, even though it's still written right there, for all of us still living in reality, to see :)
OTC - May 7, 2015, 8:29 am
Now you understand, liberals read what isn't there, take things out of context, repeat the same repsonse over and over, or attack the messenger.
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 7, 2015, 1:33 am
I have you figured out already. I say "The water in my pool is as blue as the sky" - your response would be "So your pool is in the sky? How's the water in your alternate sky?"
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 7, 2015, 1:28 am
lol. Having trouble keeping up? Where did I say Harry Reid was a climate scientist? you are hilarious.
fauxnews - May 6, 2015, 8:19 pm
So, Harry Reid is a climate scientist now? lol..How is the weather in your alternate universe? X-D
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 6, 2015, 7:10 pm
Not if climate alarmists say the data isn't falsified. Harry Reid proved that you can say anything you want without proof
freasy - May 6, 2015, 9:38 am
Bottom line, if you have to falsify the data, then guess what, its a LIE


TAGS: spock science republican creationism inhofe
Rating: 2.33/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - March 15, 2015, 1:08 pm
The irony is that you yourself are using the argument from ignorance to say God doesn't exist andy our own argument even points out your own error. And don;t forget that strawman you're beating as it wasn't stated that God exists.
fauxnews - March 15, 2015, 10:01 am
...when believing in God makes about as much sense as believing in the Easter bunny. Tell you what, Ipa, the better question is: Can you prove through scientific a***ysis and fact that God exists? When you do, I'm sure a Nobel prize awaits you. ;-) Cheers
fauxnews - March 15, 2015, 9:56 am
...The burden, mate, is on you (not them) to provide evidence for God's existence and so far there has been insufficient evidence. The word "hoax" is used when people still make $$$ off of other's stubbornness to believe in it anyways...
fauxnews - March 15, 2015, 9:49 am
...This represents a type of false dich**omy in that it excludes a third option, which is that there is insufficient investigation and therefore insufficient information to prove the proposition satisfactorily to be either true or false....
fauxnews - March 15, 2015, 9:49 am
...the fallacy here is an "appeal to ignorance" (in which ignorance stands for "lack of evidence to the contrary"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It a**erts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false (or vice versa)...
fauxnews - March 15, 2015, 9:48 am
*yawn* Science is pretty sure Santa doesn't exist either. Also a hoax - albeit a very cute and harmless one. However, they are not required to 'disprove it' anymore than they have to disprove there is a man living in the center of the moon....
ipaprime - March 15, 2015, 9:11 am
Can you prove through scientific a***ysis and fact that God is a hoax?

Republicans and their Lies. -

the first 6 months of 2015 were unseasonally cool -

Republican Deniers -

TAGS: science cat climate change science al gore
Rating: 2.27/5

More politifakes by rebeccaolsen

calron - April 4, 2015, 12:53 pm
Let's see: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/02/14/a-new-study-shows-climate-skeptics-have-more-knowledge-on-climate-science-than-alarmists/ Nope, looks like stereotyping over truth.
ipaprime - March 31, 2015, 9:03 am
The ignorance is strong in this one.
DebtToAmerica - March 31, 2015, 1:18 am
but character a**asination proves that the lizard people are trying to brainwash everyone into believing in climate change, you should be happy about being proven right, you silly homosapien! try to think of the implications of your conspiracy theory.
rebeccaolsen - March 30, 2015, 9:05 pm
OTC - March 30, 2015, 5:32 pm
Getting character a**assination.
OTC - March 30, 2015, 5:31 pm
Excuse me, I didn't know you were the spokesperson for science, but thanks for showing your true colors. You can tell me the science on one subject which I already know, but I can't say what the science is on the whole of climate channge without
rebeccaolsen - March 30, 2015, 5:23 pm
Didn't mean to take away your security blanket, hun. I think Snoopy buried it in the backyard again - next to Jesus, Mohammed, Dianetics and the other logical fallacies that fundamentalists wrap themselves in, for solace from the truth :)
rebeccaolsen - March 30, 2015, 5:00 pm
No one is forcing you to agree with the science. I'm just telling you what the science is
rebeccaolsen - March 30, 2015, 4:58 pm
Didn't realize Calvon's persecution complex was contagious. You should get that treated before you short circuit again and "roll on the floor"
OTC - March 30, 2015, 3:34 pm
No "other" scientific facts? So you do have a closed mind. You'd rather argue what you think MY beliefs are than your own beliefs. That says a lot.
OTC - March 30, 2015, 3:30 pm
Since I have to be specific with you, SOP means Standard Operating Procedure
OTC - March 30, 2015, 3:28 pm
So in others words, liberal mockery is a form of debating, you're not exactly following liberal SOP when debating, shouldn't you have called me a racist by now?
rebeccaolsen - March 30, 2015, 1:53 pm
There are no "other" scientific facts about MMCC,hun.FACT is - there's only one scientific consensus on MMCC.But you dont believe in logic anyways so your 'false-equivalence-logical-fallacy' is a useful security blanket for you to deal with the hard truth
rebeccaolsen - March 30, 2015, 1:35 pm
E.G.I'm a fan of Piers Anthony.But I know it's just a myth.If a derpyscientist is dumb enough to literally believe in UFOs,Sasquatch,GOD,etc.,then it's fair game to challenge the source as NOT credible because they cant distinguish between fact & fantasy
rebeccaolsen - March 30, 2015, 1:19 pm
Say someone mocks the science of climate change. But he also believes in the Loch Ness monster - his scientific beliefs are fair game for mockery. The only difference between a fairy tale about Nessie and Jesus is an appeal to popularity. Both are myths
rebeccaolsen - March 30, 2015, 1:16 pm
Nope. I'm just better at comebacks than you, denierboy :)
OTC - March 30, 2015, 12:35 pm
Too funny! somehow a comment about your climate change poster and being closed minded to other scientific facts gets twisted into an argument about religion?
rebeccaolsen - March 30, 2015, 10:27 am
I should? But what if I don't want to convert to Christinsanity and read your Bible? You need to work on your recruiting pitch. You are not going to get people to join the Jehovah's Witnesses with that come-on line. It's too honest and too forward. :)
OTC - March 30, 2015, 9:48 am
Nah, she should just keep her mind closed and carry on
ipaprime - March 30, 2015, 9:27 am
And you should study history and geography.

Facts tend to have a scientific bias built into them -

F i n a l l y ! -

TAGS: republican jesus science christian fundamentalism
Rating: 2.2/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Cyberhagen - March 1, 2015, 1:05 pm
Part Mithra too. I'm sure he's based on a real person , but also a few others as well.
fauxnews - February 28, 2015, 12:48 am
Zeitguy - February 28, 2015, 12:13 am
Um.. Jesus is kind of a fictional figure. Just saying.
OTC - February 28, 2015, 12:03 am
Democrats see Jesus as a fictional character, until they can use Him to promote their cause. Then He becomes very real.
Zeitguy - February 28, 2015, 12:03 am
And cliche is a female naughty part.
Zeitguy - February 27, 2015, 11:24 pm
Faith is required to be elected in the USA. Atheism is a 4 lettered word in American politics.
fauxnews - February 27, 2015, 11:04 pm
They don't. The cliche is that they are all atheists, remember? X-D
Zeitguy - February 27, 2015, 10:26 pm
How do Democrates see Jesus? I'm thinking as an irreverent black butler that occasionally has brief conversations with the douche bag teenage kids.

T h e T e a P a r t y -

Duh-Nye the Climate Change vs. Bill Nye the science guy -