Over 58381

Science Politics

Democrat Robert C. Byrd -

SPOCK FOR PRESIDENT - As a former Starfleet Science Officer I can offer scientific and logical solutions to the problems we now face

TAGS: spock presodent science logical solutions
Rating: 4.93/5

More politifakes by Budog

RonaldReagan - January 12, 2014, 2:26 pm
Funny. Nimoy would actually work.

SCIENCE VS RELIGION - One will fly you into space, the other will fly you into a building.

TAGS: religion science rationality
Rating: 3.24/5

More politifakes by Cadaver

kellyvanrijn - May 12, 2014, 11:58 am
The title should have been: Science vs Islam. Jews, Christians and Buddhists do not fly planes into buildings.
fauxnews - February 1, 2014, 9:34 pm
...but I know you didnt mean anything homophobic by that. I dont blame you for not wanting to be mistakened for one of them.Who would want to be one of THOSE homophobic losers.But you have nothing to worry about,it's not like you're one of them,right? X-D
fauxnews - February 1, 2014, 9:31 pm
Gee, OTC...I wish Arnnatz and StoneTools would've figured that out before running away from here like cowards, after getting banned TWICE for making homophobic remarks. Must make them mad that I can keep posting here while they can't. Such a shame...
OTC - February 1, 2014, 8:58 pm
Theatre uh? Always figured you to be a member of Film Actors Guild (F.A.G.)
fauxnews - January 31, 2014, 8:27 pm
Curious,Arnnatz..what else would you'think' I thought you said? Do you really think I would expect YOU of all people to compliment me on this forum by calling me"a Jedi"(lol)? Are you really (A)that dumb or (B)that desperate?Cant wait to hear this one lol
fauxnews - January 31, 2014, 8:20 pm
In theatre, a "farce" is a comedy that aims at entertaining the audience through situations that are highly exaggerated,extravagant,and thus improbable.Which is totally me on this forum.So,trust me. I knew what you meant.Have you seen my avatar lately?
fauxnews - January 31, 2014, 8:18 pm
*pfft* Whatever..I totally knew what you mean.haha..Are you serious? You really can't be that dumb. Do you even know what "farce" means? You're grasping for straws now.lol
OTC - January 31, 2014, 5:32 pm
Translation(fauxnews/sophia): I didn't realize it said farce, I need to start projecting big time!
fauxnews - January 31, 2014, 3:57 pm
Nah, doesn't suck at all. Why would I edit it? Taking this place too seriously and being pathologically insecure is your thing, Arnnatz. I can make a joke, even poke fun at myself, and not get b-utthurt over it like you do. Must "suck" that you can't,huh?
OTC - January 31, 2014, 3:42 pm
must suck not being able to edit your admitting that you are a farce
OTC - January 30, 2014, 5:33 pm
rofl, glad you agree!
fauxnews - January 30, 2014, 11:03 am
It is indeed, OTC. It is indeed.
OTC - January 30, 2014, 9:58 am
But the farce is strong with you.
fauxnews - January 28, 2014, 9:24 pm
Prepare for your mind to be blown...I don't believe in God AND I care a lot about what happens to others AND I don't like liberals. Want to see my next magic trick?
AlphaForce - January 28, 2014, 5:47 pm
Terrorists claim religion but they are not religious, even though they may think they are. I've never killed for Jesus. Mohammed would be turning in his grave if he knew what people are doing in his name.
AlphaForce - January 28, 2014, 5:45 pm
These cold heart killers don't believe in god so they don't care about what they do to people. I believe in God and I care for everyone. You sound like you don't believe in God you probably could care less what happens to other people.
AlphaForce - January 28, 2014, 5:44 pm
It isn't superstition. Science says I should be dead Science says my truck hit a tree. When in fact my vehicle held the road better than it ever did. My comment about religion in school isn't about stopping a bullet. It's about people caring more for life
fauxnews - January 28, 2014, 5:35 pm
Your superstition wouldn't prevent that tragedy from happening anymore than me using the force will control people's minds. See??? I just tried, again. Jessica Alba still won't sleep with me. The force is weak with this one.....:-p
fauxnews - January 28, 2014, 5:32 pm
???? How does prayer stop a bullet? Remind me again?? In fact, wouldn't that just incite fanatics who hate that religion to come into the school and attack enemies of that religion? Schools should be a religion free zone for a reason...common sense.
OTC - January 28, 2014, 5:22 pm
They flew into a building using science, so you're saying they are both evil?
AlphaForce - January 28, 2014, 3:29 am
No where does the bible say God says to kill innocent people. Frankly if we had prayer in school we wouldn't have so many senseless killings. Just last night a family of 3 was sh** and killed in a home invasion in my home town Ashtabula Ohio.

Obama Blames Global Warming For ISIS & Boko Haram -

Mad Scientist -

TAGS: holdren czar science eugenics progressives
Rating: 4.76/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Pikeman - November 4, 2015, 12:06 pm
This are tyrannical fantasies of a madman and the views of the person in control of science policy in the United States.

Bill Nye the Socialist Clown -

DID YOU SKIP SCIENCE CLASSES MITT? - And did you not listen to the Airline Stewardess the 100's of times they explained to you in detail the reasons for the emergency oxygen masks at high altitudes?

TAGS: mitt romney window science poster
Rating: 2.5/5

More politifakes by marms

HRoark - September 28, 2012, 4:55 pm
We exist in spite of government
GrouchoMarxist - September 27, 2012, 7:23 pm
We don't exist because of government.
HRoark - September 27, 2012, 12:50 pm
Teachers, roads, bridges, & internet, all built with public money. Public money = taken private money. Govt does nothing to make money.
GrouchoMarxist - September 25, 2012, 6:38 pm
Which of the 57 sates is d**** in chief visiting? He failed geography?
GrouchoMarxist - September 25, 2012, 6:37 pm
You have a business... You didn't build that... Spin spin spin spin spin
crankyhead - September 25, 2012, 4:35 pm
You want to know who else wants to roll down the windows when they're on an airplane at 30,00 feet? 4 year olds.
crankyhead - September 25, 2012, 4:34 pm
Oh, he was joking was he? Judge for yourself. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ws_s38QmxM&feature=player_embedded
marms - September 25, 2012, 1:43 pm
Obama was talking about Teachers, Roads, Bridges & Internet when he said "If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that" Then Mitt builds his campaign & convention on Obama's words intentionally taken out of context. Mitt should watch what he says.
freasy - September 25, 2012, 12:46 pm
The Los Angeles Times story that relayed Romney's airplane remark to the world was based off a pool report written by the New York Times's Ashley Parker. When we asked. "Romney was joking," she e-mailed. it was self-evident that he was. "The pool report p

Global Warming Is A Hoax -

Got 99 problems -

LEAVING KANSAS - You're now allowed to use your brain again.

American Conservatives and their knowledge of science -

Liberal Science Deniers -


Liberal Science Deniers -

Scientific Consensus on Global Warming??? -

TAGS: global warming consensus climate change hoax scam farce michael crichton junk science green religion alarmists warmists greenies al gore ipcc agenda21
Rating: 4.69/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 25, 2015, 9:29 pm
I've seen worse, Ala 62039. Being fired for pointing out AGW junk science.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 6:19 pm
You're wrong again, "activist" scientists, not scientists. Activist scientists have been caught drawing conclusions before doing the research, its not that hard to follow along.
calron - April 25, 2015, 5:00 pm
What's really bad is that natural variability could be used to support AGW, but some shout denier whenever you bring it up as a cause for warming.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 4:48 pm
As long as it annoys Rebecca, it is worth it to me. X-D It's the only thing keeping me going, mate. :-) F*ck carrots and gum.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:48 pm
Like when Rush Limbaugh lied this week about the Duke study. The authors of that study actually came out against him because the political media does this all of the time. That is scientists up in arm over being exploited in a non-debate
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:46 pm
By now, it's common sense knowledge in the world of academia that climatology firmly supports the theory of MMCC. The scientific community is not at odds over this. It's the public that is on the fence. Talking about it too much distracts from the issue
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:43 pm
Don't really care about any of that. If or when the media is wrong about MMCC, doesn't change the fact that the science community is firmly behind MMCC in both consensus and findings.
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:39 pm
Roughly 1.59% of the abstracts reach the conclusion that he says the majority agrees with. That's not in the ballpark. If he chose a different standard to measure the consensus, he could have got the 97.1%.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:33 pm
the scientists will just get each other's back like some country club. That's absurd. That's not what peer review means. On this issue, there has been enough fact checking that this bias would've been revealed by the present.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:31 pm
It would appear Faux is talking about peer-reviewed journals about climate change, not the consensus. Roughly speaking, virtually all of them ARE behind the MMCC theory. OTC's problem is he thinks peer review is biased because
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:27 pm
Cook is guilty of being sloppy, not being debunked. Roughly speaking, he was in the ball park. Again you are splitting hairs hun. Peer review has caught it. It's just not a big enough issue to matter. Climatology isn't up in arms over this for good reason
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:24 pm
I've red a few and this is not necessary true. Take Cook's census for example. It reaches a conclusion that is debunked by Cook's own numbers rather than reaching the conclusion supported by the numbers. Peer review should catch it, but it still happens.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:34 pm
Like the past 2 years of unusual cool climate is suddenly "just weather". Anyways, have a good weekend and break that cig habit, you're more amusing nicotine free :-)
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:31 pm
*Sigh* Perhaps you missed my posts stating that I don't deny human impact (contributing), I'm fully aware of MMCO2 but I do deny it's the sole driver of current trends in CC. And I notice anything to the contrary of MMCC is not welcomed
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:23 am
Alrighty then. Off to start my weekend. A night of me designated driving for my friends while others get drunk :-/ WEEEEE! Anyhow, fun jousting with you mate. Let's do it again next week if the spirit moves us, OTC. Cheers. :-) Fox is off the air.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:20 am
P.S. Don't think I didn't notice you abandoning your cosmic ray Henrik denier theory. ;-) Is science like a crap shoot for you? One of these days do you just hope to roll the dice 'just right' and find a random link that will finally pay off? X-D
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
The only Quote from that article that matters - "It does not, the authors emphasize, change the evidence of human impact on global climate beginning in the 20th century." #PWNEDYOURSELF
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
Even you admit, in your game of pigeon chess, that they are not removing the human element. You're grasping for straws - everything else you said is irrelevant in light of that concession.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:10 am
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:08 am
Well even this states it doesn't. remove the human equation, but the climate models didn't predict a cooling and that has them confused, which is funny because not everything was used in the models because scientists didn't think it was significant
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:15 pm
...I think, sometimes, you are confusing the political conclusions drawn by the liberal crowd which I agree are conflated.However,the peer-reviewed journals simply say:MMCC is unequivocal.They do not endorse the dire predictions of Al Gore or the libs...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:13 pm
...in that sense, we've always been in agreement. The libs, as badly as the GOPers, have dragged the science dialogue into the political gutter. And the libs have their own denier issue to deal with -- the anti-vaccination movement...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:08 pm
...The scientists are just reporting their findings. How long and how bad MMCC will affect the planet is up for conjecture.All they can claim is it's happening and a serious issue.It's not meant to be a crystal ball about next years temps or Superbowl win
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:06 pm
P.S. Before you go down another rabbit hole, I can save you the trouble: all the consensus says about MMCC is that it is unequivocal.It doesnt claim to predict everything. It doesnt claim it will be the end of the world.The lib politicians are doing that
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 8:56 pm
Source? I think I'm sure about what you are speaking about. But with you, I can never be sure. ;-) Provide a citation, please. And yes, the MMCC debate ended more or less many years ago. It's not confusing for the scientists, just the quacks.
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:51 pm
If the debate on MMCC is over, then why is there a global temperature conundrum that scientists plan to address this fall? I thought it was settled.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:20 pm
...except Scientology. You can judge Scientology. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:19 pm
Scientology was created in the 20th century by a science fiction author. An awful science fiction author. Religion of any kind holds us back. But none of us has the right to judge the other - Be you Xtian, Jew, Muslim, Agnostic Atheist...etc
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:15 pm
I actually respect religion even if I don't believe in God. I just don't respect fundamentalism. If you want to pick on a religion of liberal geeks, pick on Scientology. It has "science" in the title, at least. It is a liberal tard fest. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:13 pm
The science on MMCC is simply a report on the findings. Whatever problem you have with the politics of it comes with your own philosophical problem with how science works, which a**umes a theocratic pov as the inverse since you are making this about faith
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:09 pm
And by "theocratic", what I mean by that is - again, it's revealed when you overplayed your hand with your philosophical problem with science: Science doesn't pretend to be infallible. That is what religion is for. Science isn't a religion for geeks.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:53 pm
No, becca. Coffee. Lots and lots of coffee :-/ They have Taco Bell Mountain Dew Baja Blast in the can now for a limited time! :-D Now I dont have to sneak my McDonald's cup into there and steal it. X-D I can get my caffeine fix from the convenience store.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:51 pm
You have such unreasonable distrust toward science,wildly a**uming political bias everywhere you can.Yet you haven't a skeptical bone in your body over secular Christian ideology,which is rife with politics? You have a theocratic agenda on MMCC, mate(2/2)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:41 pm
It proves you are more than a simple contrarian. It proves you are delusional, mate. :-/ Your problem isn't with MMCC. Your problem is with science, and how it works. And your issue with it is a purely philosophical one.(1/2)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:29 pm
You're actually on top of things for a change.Not that obliterating OTC's argument is rocket science.Regular science would do - something he doesnt comprehend.But a coherent argument from you,Faux? You must've remembered your nicotine gum this morning :)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:21 pm
"when the facts show it is wrong following a proper scientific inquiry,which already demonstrated human-induced CC was unequivocal." Finishing that sentence for you,denier :) Know you wanted to imply politics or bias was behind the rejection.Not today hun
OTC - April 24, 2015, 11:37 am
I didn't state that he disproved MMCC. But this does prove that research that finds reasons for CC other than humans is rejected.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:23 am
And how does your idiotic anecdotal observations about weather counter my thorough refutation of Henrik? The man YOU CITED as DISPROVING MMCC?? Oh yeah,it doesn't because you can't - hence this LAME red-herring, Im sorry, I meant 'attempt at sarcasm.' :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:14 am
lol...You can't be serious, mate...lolololol...Yeah, the scientist's evidence vs. your own two eyes. Well...I went to China last year and didn't fall off the Earth. Guess those flat Earthers were right! X-D Hmmmm?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:10 am
Let me guess, a tornado? GW! a hurricane? GW! a blizzard? GW! so this cooler than usual weather must be GW, right? isn't that what the consensus is?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:07 am
We're told 2014 was the h**test year on record, yet when I'm usually experiencing several days in the 100s, we had 1, maybe 2 days in '14. & for the 2nd yr in a row its almost May but instead of the normal 90s we are barely hitting the 80 degree mark
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 10:01 pm
So please, mate, call me a "denier." In fact, I will be disappointed in you if you don't. Yes, I'm the biggest JUNK SCIENCE DENIER around. ;-) If in your game of pigeon chess that represents Check mate, then it's a game I'm PROUD to lose. #WINNINGBYLOSING
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:57 pm
But basically you say any interpretation of science you present is BEING DENIED if we disagree with it. Fair enough. I'm a JUNK SCIENCE DENIER. I see your junk science and raise you 10000+ peer reviewed studies and the 97-99% consensus that backs it.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:56 pm
It's point (B) you are refuting. Now with your debunked cosmic ray nonsense. The effectiveness of GCRs in cloud formation has been shown to be dubious. GCRs exert a very tiny influence over low-level cloud cover, not enough to account for sh*t.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:53 pm
But the reason WE KNOW man-made CO2 is causing GW now is because (A) CO2 in theory CAN cause CC (a point you've conceded) and (B) thousands of investigations by reputable scientists and have found the correlation in a myriad of ways that is unequivocal.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:52 pm
Just because man-made CO2 or cosmic rays COULD cause climate change, doesn't mean all climate change is caused by CO2 and cosmic rays. See what I did there? I included CO2 as well.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:50 pm
Sure...if all this happened, it could cause global warming. But there is ZERO evidence that any of this happened. And by pushing it, you are engaging in a causal fallacy. ie.Just because Socrates is a man, doesn't mean all men are Socrates.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:49 pm
In order for GCRs to successfully seed clouds, they must induce aerosol formation which THEN must grow sufficiently through the condensation of gas in our atmosphere to form cloud-condensation nuclei. Then his must lead to increased cloud formation.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:47 pm
FACT- Cosmic ray flux on Earth has been monitored since the 1950s, and has shown ZERO-ZILCH-NADA significant trends over that period. FACT - our global solar magnetic field also has NOT changed appreciably over the past thirty years.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:45 pm
However, it turns out that none of these hypotheticals that Henrik proposed are occurring in reality. For instance, a nuclear winter COULD create global cooling. But that doesn't mean nukes caused the ice age.lol.. What matters is the PRESENT causes NOW
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:39 pm
Hypothetically, an increasing solar magnetic field COULD deflect cosmic rays, which hypothetically seeds low-level clouds, thus decreasing the Earth's reflectivity and causing GW.That's his hypothesis.But is that ACTUALLY happening? Is it the reality now?
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:36 pm
In fact, it's funny, but you are pretty much just copying and pasting what Henrik is saying. I know. I checked. Again, here is the refutation mate--->
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:34 pm
You're simply posting something without demonstrating comprehension of the concepts involved.I gave you the methodology to verify your claims.You ignored it and simply repeated an empirically disproven concept.In other words,you're talking out of your a$s
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:31 pm
Mother nature is not denying the science. You are, denier. There are 4 requirements that must be true for his theory to be valid. They failed to produce results when tested repeatedly against empirical variables. And you are not replying to that.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:28 pm
And that didn't reply at all to the evidence I cited. Just more pigeon chess from you. Yes, you are good at the copy and paste function, mate. Now apply that same vigor to actually learning the science you deny. :-) You might learn something
OTC - April 23, 2015, 9:02 pm
You understand his findinds that when the sun is active, as it has been, it shields us from cosmic rays reducing cloud cover which heats up the planet. with the sun becoming less active, more cosmic rays will produce more clouds
OTC - April 23, 2015, 8:55 pm
The sun is going into a grand minimum, temperatures have flatten recently and scientists are suggesting a cooling period. There's too much invested in the MMGW hype to accept a Global Cooling. Everyone can deny that science, but Mother Nature won't
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:21 pm
It turns out that none of these Hen'schypotheticals are occurring in reality, and if cosmic rays were able to influence global temperatures, they would be having a cooling effect. This IS why he is ignored and why you don't know **** about MMCC.Cheers :-)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:18 pm
In summary,studies have shown that GCRs exert a minor influence over low-level cloud cover,solar magnetic field has not increased in recent decades,nor has GCR flux on Earth decreased.In fact,if GCRs did have a significant impact,cooling wouldve occurred
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:16 pm
3)Cosmic rays must successfully seed low-level clouds.4)Low-level cloud cover must have a long-term negative trend. Fortunately climatology had empirical variables against which they tested these requirements. Study after indie study debunked Hen's theory
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:12 pm
In order for this theory to be plausible, all four of the following requirements must be true.1)Solar magnetic field must have a long-term positive trend.2)Galactic cosmic ray flux on Earth must have a long-term negative trend
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:09 pm
, the Sun can turn the temperature up and down. ... As the Sun’s magnetism doubled in strength during the 20th century, this natural mechanism may be responsible for a large part of global warming seen then." End quack quote. (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:07 pm
Henrik Svensmark says -- It's cosmic rays! The quack says, "When the Sun is active, its magnetic field is better at shielding us against the cosmic rays coming from outer space, before they reach our planet. By regulating the Earth’s cloud cover,(1/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:05 pm
who also say radiation is proof of Jesus's resurrection because they claim it explains away the carbon dating which shows the Shroud of Turin to have originated a few hundred years ago, not 2000 yrs ago. Junk science is real neat, huh? (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:01 pm
He IS ignored because he was proven wrong. PERIOD. He blames everything and I mean EVERYTHING on cosmic rays, including evolution. Congrats! You know how to use Google, mate. ;-) While you at it there you'll find these Russian "scientists" too (1/2)
OTC - April 23, 2015, 5:09 pm
Like Henrik Svensmark who gets ignored because his research didn't coincide with the consensus
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:20 pm
Even so, Michael Crichton's opinion on this means about as much to the CC debate as Steven Spielberg's opinion. ie.Not very much. A poster like this plainly proves the deniers are simply trolling science. It is proof of nothing. 1 Lion
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:18 pm
We are discussing 10000+ studies, reproducible results, in what is called PEER-REVIEW. The consensus vernacular is plainly the "CC for Dummies" explanation for that.It is not meant as a substitute for hard science, which already exists for MMCC(2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:14 pm
Michael Crichton, who is the author of this quote, never did a study on climate change. Nor was he a climatologist. The part you missed, though, was where he says: "what is relevant is reproducible results." Every major CC study has been reproduced(1/2)

SCIENCE vs. Teabag Party Logic -

TAGS: tea party jon stewart science
Rating: 2.78/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Zeitguy - July 2, 2014, 11:31 pm
I love how an insightful comedian raises the ire of the extreme right with facts and unbiased candor. They hated George Carlin too.
fauxnews - July 2, 2014, 3:24 pm
Always the voice on sanity here, TA. :-) No kidding, right? It's either a turd sandwich or a diarrhea shake. At the end of the day, it's a menu full of crap however you cut it. X-D
terroraustralis - July 2, 2014, 2:51 pm
its a shame 'sirloin steak' isnt on the US political menu, so to speak

Change the record already. Everyone should just shut up about global warming. Nobody is going to change their mind, so talk about something that actually matters instead. -

TAGS: noah science
Rating: 2.6/5

More politifakes by CthulthuDownUnder

fauxnews - August 13, 2014, 9:10 pm
Curlyrocks - August 13, 2014, 8:57 pm
Tell ya what I'll cut you a deal, I'll stop comparing GW to a religion when you stop preaching all that fire and brimstone end of the world nonsense
Curlyrocks - August 13, 2014, 8:55 pm
can we do it?
Curlyrocks - August 13, 2014, 8:54 pm
away was in a bad location. No one objects to this, they demand fracking be shut down instead of done properly, so when it happens any way (and it will) it's done 1/2 a$$ed and leaks. We need that energy and we will take it, the question is how clean can
Curlyrocks - August 13, 2014, 8:51 pm
plasic keeps building up in the sea, radiation keeps leaking from Fukushima, fine particulates keep building up in the arctic turning the ice black (probably the real reason for them melting) and more green space is cleared because the strip mall 2 miles.
Curlyrocks - August 13, 2014, 8:49 pm
to reduce pollution and make the world more environmentally sound, I just think that focusing on CO2 when there are a lot of bigger more obvious problems with the environment is stupid. Maybe CO2 is bad, there's still no definite proof, meanwhile the...
Curlyrocks - August 13, 2014, 8:42 pm
The science shows a 1 degree temprature rise in 100 years, history ice core samples and other refrence points show that the earth has undergone much more drastic changes in its climate before human existence and well before the industrial age. I want....
Julie33 - August 13, 2014, 7:56 pm
Great! Thank you for the share.
fauxnews - August 13, 2014, 6:58 pm
Ironically,I hope you're right. Who wants to be right about calamity? But they're probably right on this :-/ But...but...what if we cut down pollution and make the world a more environmentally friendly place and it's for nothing? ;-) Is it? ;-p Nuff said
fauxnews - August 13, 2014, 6:56 pm
But are you telling me you'd place all your bets on the 3% chance?Because of your fundamental distrust of science any time, any where.Or would you pull a Bob Marley and find one quack doctor who claims your cancer can be cured by herbs and happy thinking?
fauxnews - August 13, 2014, 6:53 pm
It's about a balance of probability. The probability is so great in the case of GW that it warrants action, just like if doctors gave you a 3% chance to live.Sure,there's a slim chance they're wrong.Science never claims to be infallible. Religion does.
fauxnews - August 13, 2014, 6:50 pm
...Not because the Bible says it, and not because a large number of pastors signed a declaration. Just 3 ministers in Eastern Kentucky said it. Can you see how that would be unfair of me? This isn't ROCKET SCIENCE...just 'science.' ;-) Cheers.
fauxnews - August 13, 2014, 6:49 pm
...Any non-consensus opinion rendered by a scientist is not authoritative. What you are doing is like if I were to try and argue that "The Xtians" believe that all people who eat chocolate will go to hell, just because 3 Baptist ministers said it....
fauxnews - August 13, 2014, 6:46 pm
It is possible that some experts said what you say they said, but unless there was a consensus, you are still attempting a straw man by citing their opinions. The scientific community only wields authority when it acts by consensus....
fauxnews - August 13, 2014, 6:45 pm
So let's have that conservation: *ahem*
fauxnews - August 13, 2014, 6:43 pm
...the 'right' have the shroud of Turin people who think they have hard evidence of the resurrection of Christ.LMAO...But if speak about "real science", I don't think you are honestly entering that world...yet.
fauxnews - August 13, 2014, 6:42 pm
...and, ironically, on that you are correct. Junk scientists, who make up the fringe, don't deserve your time. Liberal examples of that are the Bigfoot hunters who hope to sneak in environmentalist politics by claiming the forests still hold 'magic'...
fauxnews - August 13, 2014, 6:41 pm
Look, you are not looking at "science." You want to have that conservation? Any time, any where. :-) In the meanwhile, the problem is you are NOT actually speaking about "science." Basically you define science as a religion of the left/liberals...
Curlyrocks - August 13, 2014, 5:09 pm
so you constantly tell us to look at the science so I did, and it turns out I'm still not convinced so now you want to take science out of the conversation?
fauxnews - August 13, 2014, 1:42 pm
I agree the politics surrounding the issue is wack on both ends, Obama and the right. The science and the data, however, is not. Leave them out of it. They are just doing their jobs. Sheeesh.
fauxnews - August 13, 2014, 1:40 pm
That is so thoroughly an ignorant comment lacking in understanding about the complexities of climatology and the issue you are speaking of that any one has ever uttered. The only sci-fi here is the story you just told. You wear your ignorance proudly.
Curlyrocks - August 13, 2014, 1:32 pm
Because the earth warming 1 degree in 100 years, that's science. The earth is now out of control warming and there's only 1 way to stop it and that's by shutting down 90% of energy and transport, that's pseudo-science fiction.
Zeitguy - August 13, 2014, 10:42 am
I love the whole titanic thing you have going on there. Cracked my a** up.
EmmaRoydes - August 13, 2014, 9:35 am
As opposed to lefties who go with government as the answer to everything. How's that working out for you?

HISTORY REPEATS - Regardless of your political, religious, or spiritual persuasions, it will happen again.

AL GORE - Sucks at Photoshop: Reverse Hurricanes, Central America, and Greenland Ice are gone.

The G.O.P. Hates Science -

The Teabag Party Narrative -

Science states man is causing global warming -

TAGS: all the things that we enjoy in life brought to us science including global warming
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by OTC

Zeitguy - June 21, 2014, 12:30 am
Unsure of your point. The nature of scientific process evolves as additional factors and evidence is revealed without prejudgment. Your posters exhibit the opposite approach.

HONORARY AEROSPACE ENGINEER! - or rocket scientist- take your pick!


The Climate Crusader -

THE SAME MOONBAT LIBERALS - That created a panic about global warming are now saying that water does not prevent dehydration!

EUROPE IS COLLAPSING - And yet they worry that bottled water manufacturers are claiming that water actually helps prevent dehydration and want to ban this claim. Leave it to politicians to fiddle while society burns.....Priceless!

Libtard Science Logic 101 -


TAGS: science vs science
Rating: 4.33/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

foxrecon19d - August 25, 2014, 1:28 am
Preach on, brother!! Like I said, I wish there was a way to encapsulate everything you said into a poster
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 5:56 pm
due to the fact that each nation's institutions follow their own governments, controlling such a large percentage of academic institutions and publishers would require a more extensive network than would be required to control every government on earth.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 5:52 pm
but science is not an entity, its a method. academic institutions do not fall under one international governing body, they all independently follow the scientific method because of its proven effectiveness.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 5:31 pm
its inevitable that some scumbags will try to defraud the system for personal financial gain, but science is a robust system, frauds get caught soon after attempting to publish, and it is impossible to get more funding without publishing your last project
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 5:22 pm
dramatically increasing research funding would result in many more dead-ends and failed experiments, but it would also mean a quicker return time on the invesment, and faster progress for humanity.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 5:14 pm
but exploring every design is exactly what they need to do. the more different people are looking at a problem, the more likely it is that one of them will come up with a breakthrough that solves the problem.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 5:06 pm
the research that gets conducted today depends largely on what there is funding avaliable for, promising possibilities like nuclear fusion are pursued only by a small number of researchers because there is not enough funding to explore every design
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 5:01 pm
they dont understand how funding research works as an investment. in reality, funding a research project into clean energy is a gamble, but you only have to win once. you can bet a thousand times and still come out on top if you get that one success.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 4:57 pm
but instead of lobbying for increased funding for research, especially research into power generation, the leftists choose to propose a carbon tax, and implement it, and piss off so many people that they lose the subsequent election.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 4:53 pm
the biggest irony of it all is that if the leftists did actually support science, rather than using it like a cheap wh***, science would give them the technology to create their "socialist utopia" in under a decade.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 4:47 pm
and now, because the liberals have "claimed" global warming, conservatives wont touch it, they think "liberals believe that, so it must be bull****!"
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 4:46 pm
they figured that global warming was another thing their "big government" approach could fix, another way to show the world how liberalism is great. and they f***ed up spectacularly, because carbon taxes are a f***ing retarded idea.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 4:43 pm
leftist liberals dont control the science. science has no political party, the only reason there is a connotation between leftists and climate change alarmism is because the leftists in charge realised they could use it to justify a new tax.
terroraustralis - August 24, 2014, 4:33 pm
while its certainly true that there are plenty of environmentalist alarmist f***wads, i dont believe a false 97% consensus could be reached without solid science backing that consensus up. you cannot judge an idea based on who believes it,
Zeitguy - August 23, 2014, 10:13 am
Like the folks that question global warming; question it the same way the church questioned Copernicus.
Zeitguy - August 23, 2014, 10:11 am
It is a shame that the Dems have high jacked the global warming science while the Rhinos lead the way in denial. The truth can get lost in the propaganda.
foxrecon19d - August 23, 2014, 2:21 am
I like to think that folks who question 'global warming', question it in the same way they questioned a church who said the world was flat.It is not the science being questioned, but rather those who control the science, in this case, leftist liberals
foxrecon19d - August 23, 2014, 2:09 am
...Tha Nazi government in the 1930-1940's did not say they were the superior race, they told science to prove the inferiority of the 'untermenschen.' Science is simply the truth. People with agendas who control science, can rewrite "the truth".
foxrecon19d - August 23, 2014, 2:03 am
The answer to your question, in my opinion, is that science is too innocent and trusting of authority and government. I.e. the church did not say the earth is flat. The church, which was government, told scientists to prove the earth was flat...
Curlyrocks - August 22, 2014, 9:47 pm
quantity of people respect to respect them than the "quality" of people, by quality I mean people of power and influence, and their fellow intellectuals not necessarily people of a higher moral standard.
Curlyrocks - August 22, 2014, 9:36 pm
I'm with you that intellectuals shouldn't let themselves be led around by the left. I think in the end I think a lot more of them are attention wh***s than those seeking respect, at least those being led around are. They are more interested that a larger
terroraustralis - August 22, 2014, 9:03 pm
i cannot fathom why the people who are supposed to be the smartest in the world are allowing themselves to be led, used by scumbags, when they have the potential to compete on equal footing for elected office. so much wasted potential, all due to modesty.
terroraustralis - August 22, 2014, 8:59 pm
one thing i dont understand is the preference towards the left... given the choice of being used and abused by authoritarian scumbags, or ignored by mentally handicapped RINOs, academics choose to be used and abused, and fail to demand the proper respect.
terroraustralis - August 22, 2014, 8:54 pm
its a shame neither party represents science... one parades science around like a wh*** when they can benefit politically from it, and ignore science when it disagrees with their ideology... the other hasn't the slightest idea of what science actually is


TAGS: democrats science global warming
Rating: 4/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

Zeitguy - September 14, 2014, 9:59 pm
Science has no political affiliation. Any lack of intellectual separation is just that.

Global Climate Change Timeline -


TAGS: waffle house science global warming
Rating: 3.67/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Mooooooooooooooooooo - January 25, 2014, 7:08 pm

That's low (and dumb) even for you OTC.
OTC - January 25, 2014, 5:47 pm
So you are a racist, good to know http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=shiney
fauxnews - January 25, 2014, 5:04 pm
What's a "shiney" object? ..LMAO TRANSLATION(OTC/Arnnatz's sock):He's really p-issing me off now! This poster is pushing my b-uttons. I know,I will ripoff his translation bit. That will show him! Wish I could be as witty as him..and knew how to spell :-/
OTC - January 25, 2014, 4:28 pm
Translation(Fauxnews/aka Sophia): " I have no idea what the term 'waffle' means in politics, so he must have meant Waffle House. Mmmmmmmm, waaaaafffflllleeeees, I need to go... Oh look, a shiney object!"
fauxnews - January 24, 2014, 11:52 pm
TRANSLATION(OTC/Arnnatz): I'm projecting...big time. X-D
OTC - January 24, 2014, 11:42 pm
Struck a nerve, did I?

Ice core samples -

TAGS: science has no political affiliation
Rating: 3.5/5

More politifakes by Zeitguy

OTC - June 21, 2014, 7:39 am
Try googling 'Glacier Girl'
Zeitguy - June 21, 2014, 1:22 am
Curly, I have to confess that I had to Google p-38s and I am still in question if it's in reference to a plane, can opener or handgun?
Curlyrocks - June 20, 2014, 8:16 pm
And preserved P-38's

AN INCONVENIENT KERNEL OF TRUTH - Ethanol from corn has a negative carbon footprint (takes more energy to make than it provides as fuel), but states like California still insist it is part of their Cap & Tax Scheme. Junk Science at its finest.

Indisputable Science -

TAGS: indisputable science
Rating: 3.29/5

More politifakes by EmmaRoydes

EmmaRoydes - July 22, 2014, 8:42 am
EmmaRoydes - July 22, 2014, 8:41 am
What makes manmade global warming any different?
EmmaRoydes - July 22, 2014, 8:41 am
Science has disproven science on a number of occasions. b***er being one of them, plogiston being another. There are countless instances where science has to abruptly reverse gears on conclusions that they've made when evidence rears its ugly head.
EmmaRoydes - July 22, 2014, 8:37 am
Your source for the 97%, please.
EmmaRoydes - July 22, 2014, 8:37 am
shortsighted, conjectural posters? My, my, seems like I struck a nerve. You really should attempt to leave your emotions out of any debates. It really doesn't help your cause.
Zeitguy - July 21, 2014, 11:58 pm
You denial that GW is affected by human activity is based on your lack of trust in science. Conversely 97% of those that trust the scientific method are compelled to accept the evidence as presented.
Zeitguy - July 21, 2014, 11:49 pm
Your belief that GW is false is apparent. Your shortsighted, conjectural posters that lack any scientific evidence to the contrary are reminiscent of the creationists battle with evolutionists.
EmmaRoydes - July 21, 2014, 8:15 am
You are correct that science show that phlogiston theory was horse****, but it also embraced the theory prior to denouncing it. Science can also be used to prove a natural cycle of climate change.
EmmaRoydes - July 21, 2014, 8:07 am
I think you missed my point. It's not that science is complete horsehit, it's that science is not infallible and has had its fair share of rabbit holes.
terroraustralis - July 21, 2014, 4:48 am
dont think you can just talk **** about my chosen profession, without me having something to say about it.
terroraustralis - July 21, 2014, 4:46 am
incase you dont see my point, it is that you dont know **** about science. if you did, you'd know that science is a method for establishing facts, SCIENCE IS NOT THE FACTS THEMSELVES. science is what showed us phlogiston theory was horse****.
terroraustralis - July 21, 2014, 4:43 am
yeah, f*** science! and f*** everything science has given us! f*** modern medicine, f*** the internet, f*** cars, f*** space rockets, f*** TV, f*** telephones... are you starting to see my point?

CLIMATE CHANGE? - What climate change? It's all an evil plot!

JUNK SCIENCE - Global Warming is real. Its ok to eat tainted gulf shrimp. Yet it will take years for the Gulf to recover. Unbelievable.

That is the Right Question. -

TAGS: global science false question warming
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by wsdpii

fauxnews - February 26, 2014, 11:35 am
http://www.politifake.org/comments/56375 X-D

Global warming debate = religious debate -

TAGS: global warming is not science
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by Curlyrocks

Curlyrocks - May 9, 2013, 3:59 pm
To appease god. replace god with sun and angry with co2 but keep some powerful ja****s telling you what to do to stop the issue when in reality he has no clue.
Curlyrocks - May 9, 2013, 3:57 pm
I want to point out that this satellite idea kinda opposes the original premise of this poster. Now all of humanity needs to get behind building and launching these massive satellites much like all of humanity had to spend their day off building churches
terroraustralis - May 9, 2013, 1:05 pm
you raise a good point. and that is why satellites are the safest option. they can be "tuned" to block less sunlight by being rotated to face away from the sun. all the other methods of climate control are extremely risky and have unforseen effects.
terroraustralis - May 9, 2013, 1:01 pm
it would take tens of thousands of satellites. but they'll still be cheaper than dealing with the economic catastrophe a**ociated with runaway climate change. and they'll become cheaper as space technology improves.
ipaprime - May 9, 2013, 8:02 am
as stated you would need to cover many 10s of thousands of square miles to affect the climate as you are wanting to
ipaprime - May 9, 2013, 8:00 am
your mistake is a simple one it would take a lot more than a couple of 300x300 satilites
ipaprime - May 9, 2013, 7:58 am
true but it show how events can change the environment quickly
terroraustralis - May 8, 2013, 9:03 pm
the best part is, if the satellites are too effective, and begin to cause too much cooling, they can simply use their inbuilt propulsion systems to move their rotational axis so that they block less of the sun's energy
terroraustralis - May 8, 2013, 9:00 pm
the satellites would require almost no maintinence, and would be periodically replaced as the old ones break. ion engines and solar panels can be made with zero moving parts. the only neccesary maintinence would be refuelling, carried out by robots.
terroraustralis - May 8, 2013, 8:57 pm
the size requirements are easily met by using ultra thin metallic fabric, which can be held in place by rotational inertia. the satellites simply need to spin at a certain speed, and a single satellite can easily cover an area of more than 300x300 feet
terroraustralis - May 8, 2013, 8:56 pm
the lagrange point between the sun and the earth is much further away than most satellites, but the advantage is that at the lagrange point, the gravity between the sun and earth equals out, making it much easier and cheaper to keep the satellites stable.
terroraustralis - May 8, 2013, 8:53 pm
1816 didnt kick off a long term cooling, the climate returned to normal in just a few years.
ipaprime - May 8, 2013, 8:13 am
then there would be the need for an onsite crew for maintanence
ipaprime - May 8, 2013, 8:12 am
then the size factor as the would need to cover 10s if not 100s of thousands od square miles to do the job you are looking at
ipaprime - May 8, 2013, 7:48 am
try trillions due to the fact you would have to put them beyond our current shell of satillites, then stabilize them to not move from in front of the sun
ipaprime - May 8, 2013, 7:45 am
try 1816 also known as the year without a summer due to the eruption of krakatoa
terroraustralis - May 7, 2013, 11:38 am
and however impractical and expensive they may be, they're still cheaper and more practical than a complete switch to renewables in the next 2 years. they also have the advantage of giving us precise control over climate, which CO2 reduction wont.
terroraustralis - May 7, 2013, 11:37 am
we know exactly where to put them (the lagrange point between the earth and the sun), and we can get a pretty huge surface area with a fairly light satellite using current technology. the real issue is the cost, which will be in the hundreds of billions.
terroraustralis - May 7, 2013, 11:34 am
"the day after tomorrow" is a movie. you really need to tell the difference between science fiction and science fact.
ipaprime - May 7, 2013, 8:18 am
your sattilites are a very impractical solution due to the size they would have to be and the issue of where to put them
ipaprime - May 7, 2013, 8:16 am
wrong under the "right" circumstances it would be almost instantaneous
terroraustralis - May 6, 2013, 8:20 am
the greatest advantage we have, is that climate change, at its fastest, still takes decades. and that is enough time for us to detect and counteract the changes. but we can only do that if people recognise that the change is happening.
terroraustralis - May 6, 2013, 8:18 am
correct. but that cooling would not happen overnight. it would take decades, just like how the warming is taking centuries. we would be able to detect it, and devise a way to reverse it, to keep the earth within 1-2 degrees of its current temperature.
ipaprime - May 6, 2013, 8:07 am
but without knowing all factors it is possible we could go into another glacial period
terroraustralis - May 6, 2013, 1:39 am
there would be no tax increase. just a 1% cut to everything else, or a 1% increase in the defecit. the entire point is to speed up the "natural" advances in energy and reduced carbon output, carbon sequestering is not a real solution.
Curlyrocks - May 5, 2013, 4:18 pm
Than i would to see it used for carbon sequestering. I think that as technology advances, reduction in carbon output and increased energy yield will come natural. People want that and the free market can solve the problem I believe.
Curlyrocks - May 5, 2013, 4:14 pm
I would take issue with the inevitable tax increase that would come along with that. But if it's going to happen I would prefer to see the money spent on a program of promoting fully bio-degradable plastics used in packaging and for short term use product
terroraustralis - May 5, 2013, 12:32 pm
we simply need to balance the factors we cannot control, with the factors we can control. we cannot control how much energy the sun produces, but we can control how much of it reaches the earth.
ipaprime - May 5, 2013, 6:37 am
you make a good argument but forget one key problem/ while we could slow the warming we can not stop it unless we can control ALLL factors involved, and we do not know all of them
terroraustralis - May 5, 2013, 4:36 am
and we're gonna need them anyway, since as the sun ages, its output will increase, making temperatures rise (roughly 1 degree C for every 100,000,000 years, as opposed to CO2 based warming, which is 1 degree C every 50 years.)
terroraustralis - May 5, 2013, 4:33 am
ultimately we'll never stop CO2 emissions, its technically possible, but politically impossible. the only solution that will is geoengineering, using huge numbers of specially designed satellites to block out some of the sun's output, to cool the planet.
terroraustralis - May 5, 2013, 4:23 am
by influencing levels of atmospheric greenhouse gases, and avoiding the tipping points which will lead to massive changes. tipping points like the thawing of the siberian permafrost, which could release 100x more CO2 than all human sources combined.
terroraustralis - May 5, 2013, 2:49 am
and 1000x may sound like a huge ridiculous number, until you realise just how little the government actually spends on research.
terroraustralis - May 5, 2013, 2:48 am
basically, the money the government spends on research, needs to be increased by a factor of 1000x. only then will we be able to make some real progress in stopping pollution and carbon dioxide emissions.
terroraustralis - May 5, 2013, 2:47 am
but we cant stop the corporations, or individuals, from doing that stuff. the only solution to global warming, is the creation of new technologies which make it more profitable and productive to NOT pollute.
ipaprime - May 5, 2013, 2:13 am
so how do you prevent the earth from doing what come naturaly
terroraustralis - May 5, 2013, 1:57 am
death is also "the end of a natural cycle", that doesnt mean we shouldnt resist it, and try to prevent it.
terroraustralis - May 5, 2013, 1:54 am
the problem is that, in pushing the temperatures up, it is unlikely that the cooling factors will increase. it is much more likely that they will break, and cause runaway warming.
terroraustralis - May 5, 2013, 1:53 am
you are partly correct, in that yes, those factors DO have a large influence, but they largely balance themselves out. human CO2 is not balanced by other influences, it will only balance out once the temperature has risen
Curlyrocks - May 3, 2013, 3:39 pm
I'm sure there is no doubt in the mind of some scientist who can afford the equipment and is doing well for them selfs the same way a cardinal or priest in a huge pimpin church has no doubt in god, as its done him so much good why question it.
Curlyrocks - May 3, 2013, 3:37 pm
Ya and if I spent more time reading the bible I would have a better understanding of god. My point is that I can't afford million dollar equipment to prove that global warming is happening for my self, I have to look out the window see it snow may 3rd.
ipaprime - May 3, 2013, 7:52 am
because it could just be we are hitting the end of the current ice age. ps. look up the definition of what an ice age is before you answer
Curlyrocks - May 2, 2013, 3:41 pm
Behind and under our garbage and pollution we have created as individuals. They say "global warming is the real problem" because then people are demanding a solution to a problem that has none rather then demanding responsible dumping of their by products
Curlyrocks - May 2, 2013, 3:36 pm
That was sort of my point, that as individuals we need to do things like pick up our trash, stop dumping chems on our lawns, recycle and all that hippie crap. Only then can we stop the large corporations, as they won't be able to hid their dumping ....
Renza - May 2, 2013, 9:25 am
As though the logic makes sense when there's hundreds of millions of individuals in this country alone often doing the same things.
Renza - May 2, 2013, 9:24 am
It was more of a open question rather than specifically towards your argument. Just about every opponent to climate change I've ever met is somehow opposed to reducing pollution because they think an individual impact is meaningless.
StoneTools - May 2, 2013, 9:21 am
StoneTools - May 2, 2013, 9:21 am
I never said that we should control our pollutions, I merely stated that our impact is miniscule compared to mother nature's impact.
Renza - May 2, 2013, 9:02 am
We breathe the air, drink the water, eat the food, are often in proximity to things that cause health issues (asbestos, high tension power lines, etc). seems practical to want these things to have a limited impact even on the micro level of things.
Renza - May 2, 2013, 9:01 am
ok then, here's a perfect question for any opponent or skeptic of global climate change. For what reason should we not work on reducing emissions, runoff, or any other form of pollution, even if for no other reason than the fact that we live in it.
StoneTools - May 2, 2013, 8:51 am
I think that man's contribution to climate change is much more minimal than the natural cyclic nature of the earth, solar flares, volcanoes erupting, hurricanes, tsunamis, earthquakes, methane from the sea, and everything else that is beyond our control
Renza - May 2, 2013, 7:38 am
maybe we need enough people to believe in one before it can become real?
ipaprime - May 2, 2013, 7:13 am
I live in the area that is part of the "DROUGHT" and it has been raining a lot here. and it is not the first we have had and it will not be the last
PapaFox - May 2, 2013, 6:17 am
Please try to be informed before replying: http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/
PapaFox - May 2, 2013, 6:16 am
If you'd do less a**uming on religious grounds and more investigation into the subject from scientific sources you'd have a better understanding.
terroraustralis - May 2, 2013, 1:06 am
in other words, whether or not we can save ourselves, depends on whether or not we BELEIVE we can save ourselves. global warming deniers really arent helping anyone. no god ever saved us from WW2, why would any god save us from global warming?
terroraustralis - May 2, 2013, 1:04 am
its PROVEN that the earth is warming, the only thing unproven is that humanity is causing it. so the only thing that seperate the sides, is one beleives we're doomed, the other beleives we can stop it.
terroraustralis - May 2, 2013, 1:03 am
global warming is natural selection on a global scale. we, as a species, will get exactly what we deserve, because if idiots have too much power, and we cant prevent runaway climate change from rendering the earth uninhabitable, then we deserve extinction
StoneTools - May 1, 2013, 10:07 pm
drought in the west? You mean the desert southwest? You know, where they go thru periodic droughts. Yeah, I thought that's what you meant.
Curlyrocks - May 1, 2013, 9:43 pm
I a**ume when people 1st saw a bolt of lightning some one told them it was because god or gods where angry. People who thing there too smart to fall for that kind of crap are usually the 1st to fall for it
Curlyrocks - May 1, 2013, 9:41 pm
No its weather. I a**ume when things started to rapidly warm up in the middle ages religious institutions told people it was because god is angry with them and now do as we say to correct it. I see no difference with global warming advocates.
PapaFox - May 1, 2013, 9:36 pm
Like the ongoing drought in the west is a "distraction method?"
Curlyrocks - May 1, 2013, 7:25 pm
Well you can actually see, smell ect water and soil pollution, the industries just used various tactics to distract people from real issues with real solutions that cost them money. Global warming is one of those distraction methods.
PapaFox - May 1, 2013, 6:58 pm
Same BS the industries used to spew about water pollution... until a polluted river actually caught fire.

WELCOME TO KANSAS - You're not allowed to use your brain here.

TAGS: kansas anti science nutters
Rating: 2.78/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

TheConstitutionalist - February 25, 2013, 2:37 pm
Global Warming. It's not just warming...global climate change is a far better description.
Renza - February 25, 2013, 8:52 am
What do people usually call it?
TheConstitutionalist - February 25, 2013, 3:51 am
Thank you for calling it by its proper name!!!

SCIENCE DENIAL - Should've paid more attention in science class.

THAT'S OKAY - They'll find an excuse to deny it anyway.

Conservatards need science more than science needs them. -

TAGS: conservatard science
Rating: 2.6/5

More politifakes by CthulthuDownUnder

foxrecon19d - August 15, 2014, 9:04 am
The point of the poster is THANK GOD for soldiers! If not for soldiers, stay at home left-wing liberal wingnuts wouldn't have anyone to preach Scientology to...


How do you get a Republican to learn science? -

TAGS: republicans hate science
Rating: 2.6/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

EmmaRoydes - August 8, 2014, 12:05 pm
oops, Britain was 6th place, US 7th place, Canada 8th place, and Mexico 9th place. first place went to Sweden.
EmmaRoydes - August 8, 2014, 12:02 pm
National Geographic Society conducted testing 3,000 young adults from 9 countries on geography. British youngsters (4th place) just barely edged out the US youngsters (5th place), Canada (6th place) and Mexico (dead last). Not much bragging rights there
birddseedd - August 8, 2014, 11:47 am
Point is democrats come up with this crap to scam the people. New york being under water is near a decade and a half overdue, yet they are still trying to get people to buy into this crap
fauxnews - August 8, 2014, 11:41 am
The average American also thinks that Benjamin Franklin was one of America's Presidents and couldn't pick out South America on a map. Your point?
birddseedd - August 8, 2014, 10:48 am
The average american is aware that global warming is a scam. they actually look outside.
fauxnews - August 7, 2014, 11:28 pm
Not to be nitpicky or anything, but I you made a typo. You typed 'democrat' when clearly the correct word(s) was 'average American.' X-D
birddseedd - August 7, 2014, 10:26 pm
How do you get a democrat to use REAL science? even a funnier one

SCIENTIFIC LITERACY - It sent us to the moon.

TAGS: science
Rating: 2.56/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Renza - March 1, 2013, 8:17 am
Well yeah, the less people can read facts, the easier it will be for the crazies to retain office... Same principal with education in general.
PapaFox - March 1, 2013, 5:41 am
It's amusing to see the number of conservatives who oppose literacy. :-D

JUST SAY NO - The perfect attitude everyone should take toward furthering medical research.

OXYMORONS - They're everywhere

Climate Change -

TAGS: environmentalism climate change government science
Rating: 2.5/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 2:26 pm
They have the "Walking dead" vote? See my avatar???? That's MY vote, b'itch! *pause to think* Zombies can vote?
foxrecon19d - May 12, 2014, 2:20 pm
Yes. It will be interesting to see the new strategy on how the Democrats will control the elections. They own the news. They have the dead people vote. They have the illegal alien vote. And they are denying the military vote again this year.
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 1:22 pm
...the problem, though, is the dems strategy ONLY works in a big controlled election. A thousand mini-elections, most of them gerrymandered, are too difficult to control. Be interesting to see if they can pull it off. Would be the upset of the century.
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 1:21 pm
I, for once, agree with you Fox. Fancy that. Way to read the tea-leaves on this one. I actually think you are right. The dems will use this, and minimum wage, to bring up the rear, hoping to turn out a firewall of progressives to win....
foxrecon19d - May 12, 2014, 12:35 pm
And there you have it, kids! With the huge amount of Obama supporters commenting on this poster and ignoring all other issues, the Benghazi false flag talking point for the mid-term elections will be global warming. Watch and learn.
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 11:43 am
*yawn* Or you could finally do your reputation a favor (and do this forum a solid) and just drop this grudge once and for all. All you've succeeded in doing is getting more "egg on your face"(to quote you). Need a hug, bro?
EmmaRoydes - May 12, 2014, 11:18 am
What I posted: "WTF? Guest1833 is using a lot of lines from the "discussion" with fauxnews(lol) - I'm not sure why, but I have my suspicions." and that set you off? Seriously, you do need some anger management classes.
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 4:40 am
So....what pops into your head? *note pad open, pen ready*
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 4:38 am
That’s nice.And when did this all start?In childhood?Now close your eyes and we are going to count backwards from 10.When I get to one, say the first thing that comes to mind,there’s no wrong answer. Okay,let’s begin!…10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2...ONE!
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 4:30 am
Nah,given your paranoid behavior toward me and the false accusations, you probably shouldn't mention my name at all unless you WANT my attention. You flaunted your right to go after me even after a mod told you to stop.Tell me again why I should care?haha
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 4:26 am
@Emma.."problem with understand anything, don't you" What native "language" is THAT? X-D
EmmaRoydes - May 12, 2014, 4:00 am
and, now that I think about it, fauxnews(lmao), what did I correct? Now think carefully before you respond so that you don't look like an idiot again.
EmmaRoydes - May 12, 2014, 3:58 am
geez, fauxnews(lol), all I did was put your handle in a posting and, all of a sudden, you take it as "dropping your name" You really are a goofy little squirt, aren't you? I really can help you get over your ego problem if you want the help.
EmmaRoydes - May 12, 2014, 3:55 am
You really do have a problem with understand anything, don't you fauxnews(lol). I guess we can go back to asking you just what the heck your native language is so that I can help you to understand and not embarrass yourself so often.
OTC - May 12, 2014, 3:19 am
The sun doesn't go anywhere, another liberal misconception I suppose. btw, since you're on a crusade against climate change, try to keep the temp around a balmy 72 while you're at it
Cannabal - May 12, 2014, 2:36 am
Insult? I was just being playfully sarcastic. But, hey, do as you will, and thanks for giving my crappy poster so much attention.
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 2:09 am
Scotland Yard has a old saying:“in a pool of suspects,usually the 1st one to utter a accusation at another is probably the guilty party.” If this truly has NOTHING to do with you,why dignify this drama with a response at all?Makes u LOOK suspicious.My 2¢
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 2:04 am
…because even if someone was 'impersonating' me, I certainly wouldn't bring it up here.lol..Why? Because it looks like you have something to prove now, like you're trying to cover your tracks, perhaps because you logged into the wrong account or something
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 2:02 am
Done reading."Emma"(lol),seriously…if someone's bugging u,then just PM a mod IN PRIVATE and let'em sort it out.Why always u with the PUBLIC display?Unless you're being directly attacked,you're just makin this into drama where there doesn't need to be any
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 1:59 am
Guest 1833??…WTH?!?!…lololol…Ah, a very complicated web weaved here. Fascinating!*in my best Mr.Spock voice*……….Will give my appraisal of the sit, in a few moments…still sorting this out…gimme a sec…Uh, what's your beef with Chelsea Clinton?!? lol
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 1:55 am
Ah, saw you corrected yourself a few minutes later. Glad to hear it. That's a good girl. For a second there, thought you were making another false accusation. Glad we are past that now. :-)
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 1:49 am
/typo…oops, d'amn computer, my bad…I meant "Emma"(lol)
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 1:48 am
Why are you dropping my name again, Phlegma? *lemme put on my bifocals, squint* Let me get over to the computer and see what gossipy mischief you are trying to drag me into now...Gimme a sec to get up to speed on the drama...back with you in a few
foxrecon19d - May 11, 2014, 11:49 pm
Nah... if I were John Kerry, I would gave surrounded myself with six battalions of Marine body guards, visited Camp Leatherneck in Afghanistan for thirty minutes, then put myself in for a Medal of Honor for picking a nasty booger out of my nose
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 9:58 pm
Are you John Kerry? ;o)
foxrecon19d - May 11, 2014, 9:50 pm
I am part of the establishment. And I know what the establishment is capable of doing to keep itself in power, to include corrupting an environmental issue, a women's choice issue, a medical health issue, an economic issue, etc, and make it political
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 8:45 pm
For some reason a person who has been banned a number of times keeps coming into my mind. Someone with an agenda perhaps. Name starts with a V, but I can't remember the rest.
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 8:42 pm
WTF? Guest1833 is using a lot of lines from the "discussion" with fauxnews(lol) - I'm not sure why, but I have my suspicions.
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 8:38 pm
it is pretty obvious I'm not a man. insult? and were getting along so well. Well, I thought it was going to get civil. My mistake. OK, have a wonderful day.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 7:04 pm
Karma is neither liberal or conservative, it can only portioned out by the cosmos. I mean, hasn't that ever occurred to you, man?
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 7:03 pm
Yeah, that's another problem: some people actually think that adverse climatological trends are "God's plan," forgetting also that we humans are supposed to be "stewards" of the Earth, and shirking that reponsibility will surely get us evicted all right.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 7:01 pm
What's that were saying about me being the angry one?
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 6:51 pm
If it would help her get elected Hillary would schedule an abortion for Chelsea on prime time TV.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 6:42 pm
Oh, I bet she will. I heard rumor tell that ***k Cheney will be her roommate.
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 6:09 pm
but it's so much fun. Don't worry too much, I'm told she will be joining us, in the cell next to me.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 5:55 pm
You only give Hillary Clinton more power by obsessing over her.
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 5:41 pm
you know, a good dévstvennitsa?
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 5:34 pm
couldn't we just import some frigid wenches from siberia to replenish our stock?
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 5:33 pm
Or at least, liberal karma
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 5:33 pm
You know, cosmic karma
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 5:32 pm
Don't tell Hillary's daughter that. There is always this to give you hope. http://www.tv.com/shows/strangers-with-candy/the-virgin-jerri-108007/
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 5:32 pm
Did you ever consider that it might be pre-ordained? If we f*** up the planet as bad as you say, maybe we don't deserve to be here.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 5:26 pm
No more virgins? Good! The world is a better place for it.
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 5:25 pm
I didn't actually count them, but my bartender here told me there were 72. How many are there in reality? I will count them at the next barbecue.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 5:25 pm
You're absolutely right, which is why the climate is changing and becoming less and less favorable to us humans.
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 5:22 pm
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 5:20 pm
and we do more harm than good.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 5:19 pm
Why are you such a liar? You and I both know there's no such thing as 72 virgins.
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 5:19 pm
but at least we get p'ussy http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/in-the-loop/post/gitmo-prisoners-rewarded-with-kittens/2012/08/16/3a7c9fb0-e706-11e1-8741-940e3f6dbf48_blog.html
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 5:18 pm
The only way to effectively do that is to keep the government out of it. Otherwise it becomes a mountain of red ***e, cronyism, and poorly executed.
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 5:17 pm
actually, I did spill a beer on it, but it was the fault of one of the 72 virgins who were doing a belly dance too close to me.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 5:16 pm
Considering that we humans are products of Mother Nature, we have to help it along by putting back what we took out and cutting down immensely on the pollution, and no, it doesn't require, massive government intervention to do that. People gotta act.
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 5:14 pm
I'm using a guard's smart phone. I almost dropped it in the h** tub and almost spilled a beer on it too, so he probably won't let me borrow it again.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 5:11 pm
Now I know you're a liar. Of all the cool stuff Gitmo detainees get, internet access isn't it, because the appropriations for that hasn't yet been approved.
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 5:07 pm
That has nothing to do with Mother Nature healing itself. Again the climate change debate is all about who can secure the most money from their governments, not about helping the environment, which doesn't need our help.
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 5:06 pm
It's ok, I am posting this from my cell on Gitmo
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 5:03 pm
See, that wasn't too hard, was it? And it's much safer to do that sort of thing on the internet anyway, where government servers will log it and secret government tribunal will accuse you of treason much later down the road.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 5:00 pm
Exactly, which is why it would be prudent to consider a solution for that sort of thing. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/04/140417101148.htm
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 4:58 pm
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 4:57 pm
Honestly, that could actually work. But it doesn't, because everyone wants to be the "Invisible Hand" that guids the market to their own selfish ends.
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 4:57 pm
I'll do it. All politicians are liars. The entire establishment is full of s'hit.
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 4:54 pm
Then you also have the methane bubbles that come up from the ocean floor (kind of like the earth farting) Guess what, another natural phenomenon. I don't think methane is good for humans other than as a heat source.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 4:54 pm
It doesn't take courage to say that Obama is a liar, in fact, the majority of the posters on this site outright declare that very statement in one form or another. How about saying the entire establishment is full of s'hit; that take any courage, man?
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 4:52 pm
You certainly didn't, but the article linking to Roy Spencer, who denies the theory of manmade climate-change, does not believe that the human race as a whole could make a decisive impact on global weather patterns over the course of time.
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 4:51 pm
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 4:48 pm
Restoring the biosphere is the only way to keep the planet from killing us. http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1334017/air-pollution-leading-cause-cancer-world-health-organisation-warns
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 4:39 pm
Plus, I never said man doesn't contribute, but I think it's a stretch to say that volcanoes, solar flares, and natural earth cycles don't play a larger role in what happens to the earth than man does.
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 4:36 pm
not natural
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 4:36 pm
That's a totally different situation. Bridges and roads deteriorate and need repairs. Pollution like Los Angeles has eats buildings and need repairs. That has nothing to do with Mother Nature healing itself. Afterall, buildings, roads, and bridges are
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 4:30 pm
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 4:25 pm
Well-meaning though that letter was, damaging the landscape and increasing the pollution is not going to help in the long-run. http://www.resilience.org/stories/2013-11-11/we-have-the-renewable-energy-we-need-to-power-the-world-so-what-s-stopping-us
foxrecon19d - May 11, 2014, 4:23 pm
Yup... because that is the logic that Barack Obama used. Don't believe it? Then find the courage to call Obama a liar
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 4:19 pm
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 4:12 pm
I won't deny that for a second, but since you bring up money, you think it will not be costly for us humans to rebuild infrastructure destroyed by extraordinarily adverse climate conditions?
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 4:10 pm
Exactly, money drives the efforts on both sides. If there wasn't any money in it, do you really think there would even be a debate?
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 4:06 pm
And there is a concerted effort to downplay the notion that human activity has ANY impact at all on the surrounding environment and its mechanics, which is perfect for the fossil fuel industry, so it can maintain profits without having to change at all.
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 4:00 pm
Climate change is all about who can secure the most money from their governments. In order to secure that money, they have to propose research that will prove what the government says, not break new ground.
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 3:58 pm
You can find the same thing in the latest IPCC report where the executive summary is totally politicized
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 3:56 pm
Oh, so the great globalist New World Order conspiracy shall be established in the name of environmentalism? I highly doubt that s'hit. The pretext will be infinitely more sinister than that.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 3:52 pm
What's that you were saying about Nazis? http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-deniers-intimidate-journal-into-retracting-paper-that-finds-they-believe-conspiracy-theories/
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 3:41 pm
well, if we are posting links: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/61578
foxrecon19d - May 11, 2014, 3:32 pm
Climate change is the classic example of, what Obama famously called, a false flag. Ignore it. As early as 1970, the Democrats admitted that this false flag must be used to secure power. Meanwhile, Obamacare...oh... forgot about that, didn't you?
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 3:24 pm
By the way, I can post links, too. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/dark-money-funds-climate-change-denial-effort/
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 3:24 pm
Well, I dunno, why don't tell me?
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 3:24 pm
Well, I dunno, why don't tell me?
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 3:03 pm
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 3:00 pm
Anger is bordering insanity, maybe that's why I find you amusing?
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 2:51 pm
OTC, that sounds like a great idea, that way, you conservatives will understand where the sun goes when it's nighty-night time.
OTC - May 11, 2014, 1:25 pm
Liberals don't understand sarcasm. it ties to the nonsensical poster. next you'll make a poster about night and day?
fauxnews - May 10, 2014, 9:53 pm
LOL...Oh, you hit the jackpot. X-D
Cannabal - May 10, 2014, 9:47 pm
Well, that was a great nonsensical comment.
EmmaRoydes - May 10, 2014, 8:28 pm
You are right, here in the southwest at least, the climate changes a couple of times a year. Oddly, we get cold weather late in the year and warmer weather the rest. Must have something to do with burning wood in the winter to keep warm.

SCIENCE DENIAL - Sorry buddy. Why don't you go take auto repair instead?

TAGS: science denial
Rating: 2.37/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

PapaFox - February 25, 2013, 11:46 am
And this relates to science denial how?
Renza - February 25, 2013, 11:43 am
Stopping manned space flight does suck, but it seems like this should be something republicans would be celebrating... you know, being a budget cut and all
Renza - February 25, 2013, 11:43 am
Yeah, they do need to quit being lazy and political sissies and put a budget to vote, and republicans need to quit being d-bags and actually try to work cooperatively to get something done.
ipaprime - February 25, 2013, 11:06 am
how about O's defunding NASA
ipaprime - February 25, 2013, 11:05 am
o so it is not true that democrats in the senate have done nothing to pass a budget in what is it 3 or 4 years now. or how a bout that they keep trying to raise taxes
PapaFox - February 25, 2013, 9:20 am
Until they speak out against the loons, then yes I will criticize the party.
Renza - February 25, 2013, 9:10 am
Republicans have no issue doing the same towards democrats... usually without any base in reality at that.
ipaprime - February 25, 2013, 9:01 am
so tarring evey republican is acceptable now?
PapaFox - February 25, 2013, 8:49 am
I'll admit I hate the anti-science loons that have infested the Republican party in the last few years.
ipaprime - February 25, 2013, 7:50 am
so PF you a hater now or what!


Cowardly conservatards blame libtards for everything because they are too scared to take responsibility for their own failures and lack of education. -

TAGS: conservatards science breaking bad
Rating: 2.21/5

More politifakes by CthulthuDownUnder

EmmaRoydes - August 18, 2014, 10:07 pm
I wouldn't mind having brian cranston's money!
foxrecon19d - August 16, 2014, 12:04 pm
"...but excuses and scapegoats libtards for your own failures." Wow. Really? ...heh...heh...heh...I guess everyone can thank science for exposing this typical libtard poster failure...

SCIENCE - It rocks.

TAGS: science
Rating: 2/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Rudedog - February 2, 2013, 6:00 pm
Neil Degrasse Tyson, the absolute voice of reason.
PapaFox - February 2, 2013, 2:27 pm
It's SO revealing that the right-wingers down-voted this one. The right worships ignorance. :-D

SCIENCE - It's not for uneducated amateurs.

FORBIDDEN BOOKS - My, how things have changed.

TAGS: gop anti science
Rating: 2/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

PapaFox - January 26, 2013, 3:45 pm
Science? Lies straight from the pit of Hell! :-D
Cyberhagen - January 26, 2013, 1:25 pm
What was that about paranoia? ;-)
foxrecon19d - January 26, 2013, 12:53 pm
As if a liberal democrat has the ability to read. Otherwise, they'd know what was in Obamacare and the desperate telegram for help in Benghazi, the Constitution...

How do you get an American conservative extremist to stop looking at President Obama's skin color? -

JOHN HUNTSMAN - An across the board solid candidate for POTUS. A shame he's way too sane to ever make it threw the GOP primaries.

How do you get a conservative Teabag Party Extremist to suffocate to death? -

TAGS: conservatives hate science michelle bachmann
Rating: 1/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

birddseedd - August 7, 2014, 9:58 pm
How do you get a democrat to suffocate? tell the democratic party there are minorities without enough clean air, they will outlaw breathing
birddseedd - August 7, 2014, 9:55 pm
ok, while most of the posters against tea party are more ridicule than factual, this one is kind funny. still unfactual tho.

Albert Gore -

Liberal Science Deniers -

Al "Not So Sharp" Sharpton -

Weapons-Grade Global Warming Stupidity -

The Cult Of Climatology -

TAGS: church of climatology prophet al gore goran climat change cult zealots global warming alarmists junk science
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

DebtToAmerica - March 23, 2015, 10:12 pm
"god sends hurricanes because you burn too much coal!" would have been funnier.

Commiefornia Gov. Moonbeam Proves Yet Again He's a Moronic Moonbat -

Eco-Fascists: The "Green Wing" of the Nazi Party -

TAGS: eco fascists green wing nazi party green religion greenies alarmists warmists socialism climate change junk science global warming scam agenda21 hysterians
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 27, 2015, 3:40 am
"A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire :P
fauxnews - April 26, 2015, 11:04 pm
"I have a theory that you can make any sentence seem profound by writing the name of a dead philosopher at the end of it. -Plato." (Banksy) www.twitter.com/SteveCarell/status/583642179710496769
calron - April 26, 2015, 7:59 pm
"There is perhaps no phenomenon which contains so much destructive feeling as moral indignation, which permits envy or hate to be acted out under the guise of virtue." — Erich Fromm

Global Warming Junk Science -

The Ever-Greater Pause -

The Father of Global Warming -

The Father of Global Warming -

The Father of Global Warming -

2014 Was NOT The Warmest Year Ever -

TAGS: climate change hoax global warming scam junk science al gore ipcc nasa urban heat island effect satellite temperatures
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - March 21, 2015, 11:18 pm
You forgot to account for the "data adjustment: that turned a cooling trend into a warming trend.

Bill Nye the science heretic -

Climate Change -

Climategate -

The Father of Global Warming -

The Father of Global Warming -

EPA Tyrant: "Yes, Our New Regulations Are Going to Make Lower Income People Take it in the A$$" -

Apollo 7 Astronaut: Climate Alarmism Is the ‘Biggest Fraud in the Field of Science’ -

TAGS: climate change alarmism apollo 7 astronaut walter cunningham usmc global warming fruad hoax scientific consensus green religion greenies alarmists warmists hysterians junk science eco fascism nasa ipcc
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - May 4, 2015, 12:17 am
Looks like An Appeal to Irrelevant Authority with a side of Person Credulity.

1970s Flashback -

Global Warming Alarmists' New Claim: Satellites Are Lying -

TAGS: global warming hoax satellite temperature data climate change scam junk science the pause warmists alarmists hysterians ipcc nasa al gore john christy deniers skeptics greenies green religion eco fascism
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - February 12, 2016, 2:12 am
There is also the U.S. Climate Reference Network USCRN witch [sic] is supposed to be so accurate that its numbers never need adjusting. It shows a declaine in US temp where the adjusted number show an increase.

The Party of Science -

Liberal Science Deniers -

TAGS: liberal science deniers abortion planned parenthood cecile richards margaret sanger pro life
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Dwydwyyr - August 9, 2015, 7:56 pm
What's this rubbish? Yes, germs are considered living organisms. Never heard of a single Christian Fundy demand we pass laws banning Listerine. As far as "human organisms" go, there was bombing Iraq,the death penalty,etc.Fundies are Pro-birth,not Pro-life
OTC - August 9, 2015, 7:30 pm
Not a clump of cells, parts for profit.

Environmental Wackos -

Mad Scientist -

Global Warming Hysterian -

TAGS: al gore global warming hysterian climate change hoax scam fraud green religion greenies alarmists warmists ipcc inconvenient truth eco fascism junk science
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - May 3, 2015, 11:49 pm
There's a reason I call Gore The Profit of Global Warming. He made a lot of dough off the hysteria he spreads, but that doesn't make the theory itself invalid.

Climate Alarmism -

Hillary's Global Warming Stupidity -

Global Warming -

Ironies Abound -

Warmist Buffoonery -

Journalistic & Scientific Malfeasance -

The Idiocy of MSNBC's "Science" Reporting On Full Display -

TAGS: global warming hoax climate change scam msnbs science deniers warmists alarmists liberal moonbats greenies eco fascism al gore msm
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Libertas - November 9, 2015, 10:39 pm
pretty much proves that liberals and science are incompatible.

Liberal Science Deniers -

Warmist Stupidity -

UN Climate Scientists WRONG AGAIN -

Warmists are NOT smarter than a 5th Grader -

global warming policies -

TAGS: politicization of science global warming policy fail watermelon red on the inside
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by calron

calron - February 9, 2016, 2:29 am
Actually it is a satirical reference to being green on the outside and rd on the inside.
Greeny - February 8, 2016, 7:41 pm
because nothing can top a cool melon on a h** day

Snowmageddon 2016 -

TAGS: snowmageddon 2016 winter storm jonas new york city nyc snow climate change global warming tyrannosaurus rex science deniers skeptics blizzard
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - January 24, 2016, 2:07 pm
New York should have obviously passed a law outlawing snowzilla from entering the state. :D

The Gold Standard For Global Warming Failure -

Liberal Logic -